Literature DB >> 19557846

Improving computation of cardiovascular relative pressure fields from velocity MRI.

Tino Ebbers1, Gunnar Farnebäck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a multigrid-based solver for the pressure Poisson equation (PPE) with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the specified domain, for the computation of relative pressure fields from velocity MRI data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the proposed structure-defined Poisson solver to other popular Poisson solvers working on unmodified rectangular and modified quasirectangular domains using synthetic and in vitro phantoms in which the mathematical solution of the pressure field is known, as well as on in vivo MRI velocity measurements of aortic blood flow dynamics.
RESULTS: All three PPE solvers gave accurate results for convex computational domains. Using a rectangular or quasirectangular domain on a more complicated domain, like a c-shape, revealed a systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitudes, while the proposed PPE solver, working directly on the specified domain, provided accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields.
CONCLUSION: Popular iterative approaches with quasirectangular computational domains can lead to significant systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitude. We suggest using a multigrid-based PPE solver with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the structure-defined computational domain. This solver provides accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields for both simple and complex geometries with additional significant improvements with respect to execution speed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19557846     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of methodologies to calculate intraventricular pressure differences in computational models and patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Londono-Hoyos; Abigail Swillens; Joris Van Cauwenberge; Brett Meyers; Maheswara Reddy Koppula; Pavlos Vlachos; Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Philip J Kilner; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Assessment of Reynolds stress components and turbulent pressure loss using 4D flow MRI with extended motion encoding.

Authors:  Henrik Haraldsson; Sarah Kefayati; Sinyeob Ahn; Petter Dyverfeldt; Jonas Lantz; Matts Karlsson; Gerhard Laub; Tino Ebbers; David Saloner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Pressure mapping from flow imaging: enhancing computation of the viscous term through velocity reconstruction in near-wall regions.

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; David A Nordsletten; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

5.  A finite-element approach to the direct computation of relative cardiovascular pressure from time-resolved MR velocity data.

Authors:  Sebastian B S Krittian; Pablo Lamata; Christian Michler; David A Nordsletten; Jelena Bock; Chris P Bradley; Alex Pitcher; Philip J Kilner; Michael Markl; Nic P Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation.

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Feasibility of asymmetric stretch assessment in the ascending aortic wall with DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Henrik Haraldsson; Michael Hope; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Elaine Tseng; Xiaodong Zhong; Frederick H Epstein; Liang Ge; David Saloner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Hemodynamic Measurement Using Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI: Quantification of Hemodynamic Parameters and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Guk Bae Kim; Jihoon Kweon; Sang Joon Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Dong Hyun Yang; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Sound pressure level spectrum analysis by combination of 4D PTV and ANFIS method around automotive side-view mirror models.

Authors:  Dong Kim; Arman Safdari; Kyung Chun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Alex Pitcher; Sebastian Krittian; David Nordsletten; Malenka M Bissell; Thomas Cassar; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Stefan Neubauer; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.