Tino Ebbers1, Gunnar Farnebäck. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. tino.ebbers@liu.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a multigrid-based solver for the pressure Poisson equation (PPE) with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the specified domain, for the computation of relative pressure fields from velocity MRI data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the proposed structure-defined Poisson solver to other popular Poisson solvers working on unmodified rectangular and modified quasirectangular domains using synthetic and in vitro phantoms in which the mathematical solution of the pressure field is known, as well as on in vivo MRI velocity measurements of aortic blood flow dynamics. RESULTS: All three PPE solvers gave accurate results for convex computational domains. Using a rectangular or quasirectangular domain on a more complicated domain, like a c-shape, revealed a systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitudes, while the proposed PPE solver, working directly on the specified domain, provided accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields. CONCLUSION: Popular iterative approaches with quasirectangular computational domains can lead to significant systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitude. We suggest using a multigrid-based PPE solver with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the structure-defined computational domain. This solver provides accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields for both simple and complex geometries with additional significant improvements with respect to execution speed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a multigrid-based solver for the pressure Poisson equation (PPE) with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the specified domain, for the computation of relative pressure fields from velocity MRI data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the proposed structure-defined Poisson solver to other popular Poisson solvers working on unmodified rectangular and modified quasirectangular domains using synthetic and in vitro phantoms in which the mathematical solution of the pressure field is known, as well as on in vivo MRI velocity measurements of aortic blood flow dynamics. RESULTS: All three PPE solvers gave accurate results for convex computational domains. Using a rectangular or quasirectangular domain on a more complicated domain, like a c-shape, revealed a systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitudes, while the proposed PPE solver, working directly on the specified domain, provided accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields. CONCLUSION: Popular iterative approaches with quasirectangular computational domains can lead to significant systematic underestimation of the pressure amplitude. We suggest using a multigrid-based PPE solver with Galerkin coarsening, which works directly on the structure-defined computational domain. This solver provides accurate estimates of the relative pressure fields for both simple and complex geometries with additional significant improvements with respect to execution speed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Francisco J Londono-Hoyos; Abigail Swillens; Joris Van Cauwenberge; Brett Meyers; Maheswara Reddy Koppula; Pavlos Vlachos; Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Henrik Haraldsson; Sarah Kefayati; Sinyeob Ahn; Petter Dyverfeldt; Jonas Lantz; Matts Karlsson; Gerhard Laub; Tino Ebbers; David Saloner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sebastian B S Krittian; Pablo Lamata; Christian Michler; David A Nordsletten; Jelena Bock; Chris P Bradley; Alex Pitcher; Philip J Kilner; Michael Markl; Nic P Smith Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Henrik Haraldsson; Michael Hope; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Elaine Tseng; Xiaodong Zhong; Frederick H Epstein; Liang Ge; David Saloner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Pablo Lamata; Alex Pitcher; Sebastian Krittian; David Nordsletten; Malenka M Bissell; Thomas Cassar; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Stefan Neubauer; Nicolas P Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 4.668