M P Lux1, C S Sell1, P A Fasching1, J Seidl-Ertel1, M R Bani1, M G Schrauder1, S M Jud1, C R Loehberg1, C Rauh1, A Hartmann2, R Schulz-Wendtland3, V Strnad4, M W Beckmann1. 1. Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen. 2. Pathologisches Institut der Universität Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen. 3. Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen. 4. Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen.
Abstract
Aim: Certification of breast centers helps improve the quality of care but requires additional resources, particularly for documentation. There are currently no published data on the actual staff costs and financial resources required for such documentation. The aim of this study was to determine the time and resources required to document a patient with primary breast cancer from diagnosis to the end of follow-up, to establish a database for future strategic decisions. Material and Methods: All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients with primary breast cancer were recorded at the University Breast Center of Franconia. All time points for documentation were evaluated using structured interviews. The times required to document a representative number of patients were determined and combined with the staff costs of the different professional groups, to calculate the financial resources required for documentation. Results: A total of 494 time points for documentation were identified. The study also identified 21 departments and 20 different professional groups involved in the documentation. The majority (54 %) of documentation was done by physicians. 62 % of all documentation involved outpatients. The results of different scenarios for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer patients in a certified breast center showed that the time required for documentation can be as much as 105 hours, costing € 4135. Conclusion: This analysis shows the substantial staffing and financial costs required for documentation in certified centers. A multi-center study will be carried out to compare the costs for certified breast centers of varying sizes with the costs of non-certified care facilities.
Aim: Certification of breast centers helps improve the quality of care but requires additional resources, particularly for documentation. There are currently no published data on the actual staff costs and financial resources required for such documentation. The aim of this study was to determine the time and resources required to document a patient with primary breast cancer from diagnosis to the end of follow-up, to establish a database for future strategic decisions. Material and Methods: All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients with primary breast cancer were recorded at the University Breast Center of Franconia. All time points for documentation were evaluated using structured interviews. The times required to document a representative number of patients were determined and combined with the staff costs of the different professional groups, to calculate the financial resources required for documentation. Results: A total of 494 time points for documentation were identified. The study also identified 21 departments and 20 different professional groups involved in the documentation. The majority (54 %) of documentation was done by physicians. 62 % of all documentation involved outpatients. The results of different scenarios for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancerpatients in a certified breast center showed that the time required for documentation can be as much as 105 hours, costing € 4135. Conclusion: This analysis shows the substantial staffing and financial costs required for documentation in certified centers. A multi-center study will be carried out to compare the costs for certified breast centers of varying sizes with the costs of non-certified care facilities.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast cancer; documentation; personnel costs; quality assurance; resources
Authors: Matthias W Beckmann; Mayada R Bani; Christian R Loehberg; Thomas Hildebrandt; Michael G Schrauder; Stefanie Wagner; Peter A Fasching; Michael Patrick Lux Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: J Heil; A Gondos; G Rauch; F Marmé; J Rom; M Golatta; H Junkermann; P Sinn; S Aulmann; J Debus; H Hof; F Schütz; H Brenner; C Sohn; A Schneeweiss Journal: Breast Date: 2012-02-05 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Matthias W Beckmann; Cosima Brucker; Volker Hanf; Claudia Rauh; Mayada R Bani; Stefanie Knob; Sabrina Petsch; Stefan Schick; Peter A Fasching; Arndt Hartmann; Michael P Lux; Lothar Häberle Journal: Onkologie Date: 2011-06-15
Authors: Michael Lux; Thomas Hildebrandt; Elke Beyer-Finkler; Mayada Bani; Christian Loehberg; Sebastian Jud; Claudia Rauh; Michael Schrauder; Peter Fasching; Matthias Beckmann Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: H-C Kolberg; D Lüftner; M P Lux; N Maass; F Schütz; P A Fasching; T Fehm; W Janni; S Kümmel Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: D Lüftner; M P Lux; N Maass; F Schütz; I Schwidde; P A Fasching; T Fehm; W Janni; S Kümmel; H-C Kolberg Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Sara Y Brucker; Claudia Schumacher; Christoph Sohn; Mahdi Rezai; Michael Bamberg; Diethelm Wallwiener Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-12-02 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Sara Y Brucker; Michael Bamberg; Walter Jonat; Matthias W Beckmann; Andreas Kämmerle; Rolf Kreienberg; Diethelm Wallwiener Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Margaret Formago; Michael G Schrauder; Claudia Rauh; Carolin C Hack; Sebastian M Jud; Thomas Hildebrandt; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; S Frentz; S Graubert; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael P Lux Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd Journal: Genet Med Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 8.822