| Literature DB >> 25568020 |
Elvira de Eyto1, Philip McGinnity2, Jisca Huisman3, Jamie Coughlan2, Sofia Consuegra4, Killian Farrell1, Ciar O'Toole2, Jarle Tufto5, Hendrik-Jan Megens6, William Jordan7, Tom Cross2, Rene J M Stet8.
Abstract
Laboratory studies on associations between disease resistance and susceptibility and major histocompatibility (MH) genes in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar have shown the importance of immunogenetics in understanding the capacity of populations to fight specific diseases. However, the occurrence and virulence of pathogens may vary spatially and temporally in the wild, making it more complicated to predict the overall effect that MH genes exert on fitness of natural populations and over several life-history stages. Here we show that MH variability is a significant determinant of salmon survival in fresh water, by comparing observed and expected genotype frequencies at MH and control microsatellite loci at parr and migrant stages in the wild. We found that additive allelic effects at immunogenetic loci were more likely to determine survival than dominance deviation, and that selection on certain MH alleles varied with life stage, possibly owing to varying pathogen prevalence and/or virulence over time. Our results highlight the importance of preserving genetic diversity (particularly at MH loci) in wild populations, so that they have the best chance of adapting to new and increased disease challenges as a result of projected climate warming and increasing aquaculture.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic salmon; Salmo salar; freshwater life stages; major histocompatibility; natural selection
Year: 2011 PMID: 25568020 PMCID: PMC3352546 DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00197.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Location of the Burrishoole and Owenmore catchments in Ireland (top left), the experiment river in the Burrishoole catchment (bottom left) and the position of the fish trap and artificial redds in the experiment river (right).
Akaike Information Criterion values and of five model alternatives (see text for more detail) for each locus typed in Atlantic salmon surviving in the wild in a section of the Burrishoole river system 6 months (parr) and 2 years (migrants) after introduction. The lowest AIC values (in bold) are considered to be the best fit for that locus. Values for c are the over-dispersion estimates for the best fit model, and n is the number of fish successfully genotyped at that locus
| Parr | Migrants | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H00 | H01 | H10 | H20 | H11 | H00 | H01 | H10 | H20 | H11 | |||||
| 236.0 | 227.1 | 349.4 | 237.7 | 746 | 1.83 | 272.0 | 272.3 | 371.3 | 273.1 | 428 | 1.31 | |||
| 234.1 | 225.1 | 271.6 | 235.5 | 746 | 1.85 | 259.3 | 260.5 | 280.5 | 261.0 | 430 | 1.49 | |||
| 184.4 | 180.1 | 237.1 | 186.3 | 746 | 2.00 | 217.0 | 211.7 | 264.1 | 218.9 | 430 | 1.46 | |||
| 293.1 | 298.4 | 337.5 | 299.3 | 729 | 1.99 | 270.7 | 270.2 | 310.1 | 272.0 | 367 | 1.28 | |||
| 208.9 | 199.3 | 293.1 | 210.8 | 727 | 1.77 | 277.7 | 268.0 | 331.9 | 279.3 | 369 | 1.37 | |||
| 234.2 | 234.0 | 247.6 | 231.9 | 720 | 1.62 | 320.2 | 317.9 | 335.5 | 315.2 | 363 | 1.29 | |||
| SSOSL85 | 227.9 | 237.6 | 261.4 | 233.8 | 730 | 1.92 | 247.3 | 241.7 | 271.8 | 249.2 | 365 | 1.29 | ||
| 204.2 | 200.6 | 247.4 | 206.1 | 746 | 1.88 | 222.0 | 213.4 | 270.9 | 224.0 | 430 | 1.39 | |||
| 452.5 | 454.4 | 414.9 | 363.7 | 746 | 2.02 | 374.7 | 376.7 | 380.0 | 318.4 | 430 | 1.53 | |||
| 438.5 | 440.3 | 404.6 | 376.1 | 746 | 2.35 | 367.7 | 365.9 | 367.2 | 339.2 | 430 | 1.74 | |||
| 258.7 | 309.6 | 259.0 | 746 | 1.83 | 310.0 | 311.1 | 364.5 | 311.8 | 430 | 1.39 | ||||
Figure 2Changes in allele frequencies between egg and parr (white circles), egg and migrant (black circles) and parr and migrant (grey circles). Expected egg allele frequencies were calculated from parental crosses and observed allele frequencies in salmon parr and salmon migrants stage were observed after 6 months and 2 years, respectively, in a wild environment. Alleles are ordered left to right with increasing frequency in eggs.
Figure 3Changes in allele frequencies between egg and parr (top), and egg and migrant (middle) and parr–migrant (bottom) for eight control microsatellites and three immunogenetic loci. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum changes in allele frequencies. Allele frequencies at egg stage were calculated from parental crosses, and allele frequencies in salmon parr and salmon migrants stage were observed after 6 months (n = 746) and 2 years (n = 430), respectively, in a wild environment.
Per marker P-values of chi-square tests on n × 2 contingency tables comparing allele frequencies between two life stages indicated above the column; number of alleles n = d.f. + 1. Significant values (P < 0.01) are in bold
| Locus | d.f. | Egg–parr | Egg–migrant | Parr–migrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One_107 | ○ | 0.132 | ||
| Ssa171 | 9 | 0.638 | 0.014 | 0.072 |
| Ssa197 | 13 | 0.107 | 0.035 | 0.069 |
| Ssa202 | 10 | 0.257 | 0.095 | 0.068 |
| SsaD144b | 14 | 0.270 | 0.172 | 0.196 |
| SsaG7SP | 7 | 0.021 | ||
| SSOSL85 | 9 | 0.533 | 0.280 | 0.292 |
| Ssp2215 | 11 | 0.129 | 0.206 | 0.210 |
| Sasa-DAA-3UTR | 6 | |||
| Sasa-DAA allele | 11 | |||
| Sasa-UBA-3UTR | 12 | 0.419 | 0.030 | 0.178 |
Figure 4Selection coefficients for Sasa-DAA alleles in salmon surviving at 6 months in their natural environment as parr (grey bars) and at 2 years as migrants (black bars). The selection coefficients are derived from allelic point estimates calculated by fitting observed and expected genotype frequencies to model H01 (see text for details). Alleles are ordered left to right with increasing frequency in eggs. DAA*0601 is not included in the graph as it was used as the baseline in the model, against which all other selection coefficients were measured.
Figure 5Allelic effects calculated for Sasa-DAA alleles in salmon surviving at 6 months in their natural environment as parr (left bars) and at 2 years as migrants (right bars). Allelic effects are calculated by fitting observed and expected genotype frequencies to model H01 (see text for details). Alleles are ordered left to right with increasing frequency in eggs. Whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval of the estimates. DAA*0601 is not included in the graph as it was used as the baseline in the model, against which all other allelic effects were measured.