Literature DB >> 17916734

Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.

Hitoshi Araki1, Becky Cooper, Michael S Blouin.   

Abstract

Captive breeding is used to supplement populations of many species that are declining in the wild. The suitability of and long-term species survival from such programs remain largely untested, however. We measured lifetime reproductive success of the first two generations of steelhead trout that were reared in captivity and bred in the wild after they were released. By reconstructing a three-generation pedigree with microsatellite markers, we show that genetic effects of domestication reduce subsequent reproductive capabilities by approximately 40% per captive-reared generation when fish are moved to natural environments. These results suggest that even a few generations of domestication may have negative effects on natural reproduction in the wild and that the repeated use of captive-reared parents to supplement wild populations should be carefully reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17916734     DOI: 10.1126/science.1145621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  133 in total

1.  Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation.

Authors:  Mark R Christie; Melanie L Marine; Rod A French; Michael S Blouin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Production of Chinese rosy bitterling offspring derived from frozen and vitrified whole testis by spermatogonial transplantation.

Authors:  Anna Octavera; Goro Yoshizaki
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.794

4.  Stock enhancement or sea ranching? Insights from monitoring the genetic diversity, relatedness and effective population size in a seeded great scallop population (Pecten maximus).

Authors:  R Morvezen; P Boudry; J Laroche; G Charrier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Improved viability of populations with diverse life-history portfolios.

Authors:  Correigh M Greene; Jason E Hall; Kimberly R Guilbault; Thomas P Quinn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild.

Authors:  Hitoshi Araki; Becky Cooper; Michael S Blouin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Multigenerational outbreeding effects in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).

Authors:  Sarah J Lehnert; Oliver P Love; Trevor E Pitcher; Dennis M Higgs; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  In situ measurement of coastal ocean movements and survival of juvenile Pacific salmon.

Authors:  David W Welch; Michael C Melnychuk; John C Payne; Erin L Rechisky; Aswea D Porter; George D Jackson; Bruce R Ward; Stephen P Vincent; Chris C Wood; Jayson Semmens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Extent and scale of local adaptation in salmonid fishes: review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D J Fraser; L K Weir; L Bernatchez; M M Hansen; E B Taylor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Impact of naturally spawning captive-bred Atlantic salmon on wild populations: depressed recruitment and increased risk of climate-mediated extinction.

Authors:  Philip McGinnity; Eleanor Jennings; Elvira DeEyto; Norman Allott; Patrick Samuelsson; Gerard Rogan; Ken Whelan; Tom Cross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.