Seoyon Yang1, Min Ho Chun1, Yu Ri Son1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether virtual reality (VR) training will help the recovery of cognitive function in brain tumor patients. METHODS:Thirty-eight brain tumor patients (19 men and 19 women) with cognitive impairment recruited for this study were assigned to either VR group (n=19, IREX system) or control group (n=19). Both VR training (30 minutes a day for 3 times a week) and computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program (30 minutes a day for 2 times) for 4 weeks were given to the VR group. The control group was given only the computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program (30 minutes a day for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks. Computerized neuropsychological tests (CNTs), Korean version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (K-MMSE), and Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) were used to evaluate cognitive function and functional status. RESULTS: The VR group showed improvements in the K-MMSE, visual and auditory continuous performance tests (CPTs), forward and backward digit span tests (DSTs), forward and backward visual span test (VSTs), visual and verbal learning tests, Trail Making Test type A (TMT-A), and K-MBI. The VR group showed significantly (p<0.05) better improvements than the control group in visual and auditory CPTs, backward DST and VST, and TMT-A after treatment. CONCLUSION:VR training can have beneficial effects on cognitive improvement when it is combined with computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation. Further randomized controlled studies with large samples according to brain tumor type and location are needed to investigate how VR training improves cognitive impairment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether virtual reality (VR) training will help the recovery of cognitive function in brain tumorpatients. METHODS: Thirty-eight brain tumorpatients (19 men and 19 women) with cognitive impairment recruited for this study were assigned to either VR group (n=19, IREX system) or control group (n=19). Both VR training (30 minutes a day for 3 times a week) and computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program (30 minutes a day for 2 times) for 4 weeks were given to the VR group. The control group was given only the computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program (30 minutes a day for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks. Computerized neuropsychological tests (CNTs), Korean version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (K-MMSE), and Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) were used to evaluate cognitive function and functional status. RESULTS: The VR group showed improvements in the K-MMSE, visual and auditory continuous performance tests (CPTs), forward and backward digit span tests (DSTs), forward and backward visual span test (VSTs), visual and verbal learning tests, Trail Making Test type A (TMT-A), and K-MBI. The VR group showed significantly (p<0.05) better improvements than the control group in visual and auditory CPTs, backward DST and VST, and TMT-A after treatment. CONCLUSION: VR training can have beneficial effects on cognitive improvement when it is combined with computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation. Further randomized controlled studies with large samples according to brain tumor type and location are needed to investigate how VR training improves cognitive impairment.
Authors: Jaehun Kim; Kwanguk Kim; Deog Young Kim; Won Hyek Chang; Chang-Il Park; Suk Hoon Ohn; Kiwan Han; Jeonghun Ku; Sang Won Nam; In Young Kim; Sun I Kim Journal: Cyberpsychol Behav Date: 2007-02
Authors: Sung H You; Sung Ho Jang; Yun-Hee Kim; Mark Hallett; Sang Ho Ahn; Yong-Hyun Kwon; Joong Hwi Kim; Mi Young Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Marc Hofmann; Alexander Rösler; Wolfram Schwarz; Franz Müller-Spahn; Kurt Kräuchi; Christoph Hock; Erich Seifritz Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Christina A Meyers; Jennifer A Smith; Andrea Bezjak; Minesh P Mehta; James Liebmann; Tim Illidge; Ian Kunkler; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Peter D Eisenberg; Jacobus Meerwaldt; Ross Siemers; Christian Carrie; Laurie E Gaspar; Walter Curran; See-Chun Phan; Richard A Miller; Markus F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ayal A Aizer; Nayan Lamba; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Kenneth Aldape; Adrienne Boire; Priscilla K Brastianos; Paul D Brown; D Ross Camidge; Veronica L Chiang; Michael A Davies; Leland S Hu; Raymond Y Huang; Timothy Kaufmann; Priya Kumthekar; Keng Lam; Eudocia Q Lee; Nancy U Lin; Minesh Mehta; Michael Parsons; David A Reardon; Jason Sheehan; Riccardo Soffietti; Hussein Tawbi; Michael Weller; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Christina Weyer-Jamora; Melissa S Brie; Tracy L Luks; Ellen M Smith; Steve E Braunstein; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Paige M Bracci; Susan Chang; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Jennie W Taylor Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-11-04
Authors: Christina Weyer-Jamora; Melissa S Brie; Tracy L Luks; Ellen M Smith; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Jennie W Taylor Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pearl J C van Lonkhuizen; Kete M Klaver; Jeffrey S Wefel; Margriet M Sitskoorn; Sanne B Schagen; Karin Gehring Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.328