Literature DB >> 25565322

Twelve-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Region Pain.

Nilesh Patel1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of cooled radiofrequency (CRF) lateral branch neurotomy (LBN) as a treatment for sacroiliac (SI) region pain. Whereas the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month outcomes of this procedure compared to sham treatment were previously reported, this current report shows the 12-month outcomes of CRF/LBN treatment for SI region pain.
DESIGN: This study originally included 51 subjects who were randomized 2:1 to receive CRF/LBN treatment or a sham intervention, respectively, for SI region pain. Subjects and assessors were blinded for 3 months. At that time, sham participants were permitted to receive CRF/LBN, designated as "crossover" study subjects, and followed for 6 additional months. For the purpose of this evaluation, the original CRF/LBN-treated study subjects were followed for a total of 12 months. Study participants were 18 to 88 years of age and had chronic (symptomatic for >6 months) axial back pain. All subjects were qualified for study inclusion following positive responses to dual lateral branch blocks. Lateral branch neurotomy was performed by CRF to ablate the S1 to S3 lateral branches and the L5 dorsal ramus. Pain was measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) and Short Form 36-bodily pain (SF36-BP) scores. The Oswestry disability index and Short Form 36-physical functioning (SF36-PF) assessment each served to evaluate subject disability. Treatment successes ("responders") in the originally treated CRF/LBN group at 12 months, and in the crossover group at 6 months, were also determined.
RESULTS: In the original CRF/LBN treatment group, 12-month outcomes compared to baseline were favorable, with a mean 2.7 point drop in the NRS score, a 13.9 decrease in the ODI, and a 15.8 increase in SF-36BP. In the crossover study group, 6-month outcomes were also favorable, with a mean NRS score decrease of 2.5 points, a reduction in ODI of 8.8, and an increase in SF36-BP of 11.9.
CONCLUSIONS: These favorable 12-month results illustrate the durability of effective CRF/LBN-mediated treatment of SI region pain for selected patients. Furthermore, successful CRF/LBN treatments in unblinded crossover study subjects demonstrate the unlikelihood that such positive outcomes are attributable to a "placebo" effect, and suggest that CRF/LBN is an effective therapeutic option for alleviating pain, and improving physical function and quality of life, with few complications.
© 2015 World Institute of Pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cooled radiofrequency ablation; lower back pain; radiofrequency ablation; randomized clinical trial; sacroiliac pain; sacroiliitis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25565322     DOI: 10.1111/papr.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  16 in total

1.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

2.  Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Authors:  David Polly; Daniel Cher; Peter G Whang; Clay Frank; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-21

3.  Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Fabien Bitan; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Daniel Cher; Travis Hillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

4.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

7.  Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peter Whang; Daniel Cher; David Polly; Clay Frank; Harry Lockstadt; John Glaser; Robert Limoni; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-05

8.  Durable intermediate-to long-term outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Authors:  Donald Sachs; Don Kovalsky; Andy Redmond; Robert Limoni; S Craig Meyer; Charles Harvey; Dimitriy Kondrashov
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  Fluoroscopic-guided sacroiliac, joint injections for treatment of chronic axial low back pain in a tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zakari A Suleiman; Israel K Kolawole; Ajibade Okeyemi
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2018-09

10.  Productivity benefits of minimally invasive surgery in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Authors:  Josh D Saavoss; Lane Koenig; Daniel J Cher
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.