Michael J Nabozny1, Jacqueline M Kruser, Nicole M Steffens, Karen J Brasel, Toby C Campbell, Martha E Gaines, Margaret L Schwarze. 1. *Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI †Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL ‡Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR §Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI ¶Center for Patient Partnerships, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI ||Department of Medical History and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. BACKGROUND: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. METHODS: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. RESULTS: Seniors (n = 37) and surgeons (n = 17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons. BACKGROUND: A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care. METHODS: We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions. RESULTS: Seniors (n = 37) and surgeons (n = 17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.
Authors: Emily Finlayson; Shoujun Zhao; W John Boscardin; Brant E Fries; C Seth Landefeld; R Adams Dudley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alan L Kaplan; Catherine M Crespi; Josemanuel D Saucedo; Sarah E Connor; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jacqueline M Kruser; Lauren J Taylor; Toby C Campbell; Amy Zelenski; Sara K Johnson; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Kris L Kwekkeboom; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Ari C Reichstein; Z Tuba Suzer-Gurtekin; Jane Forman; Maria J Silveira; Lona Mody; Arden M Morris Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Claire Sokas; Irene M Yeh; Kathleen Coogan; Rachelle Bernacki; Susan Mitchell; Angela Bader; Keren Ladin; Jennifer A Palmer; James A Tulsky; Zara Cooper Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Frances C Wright; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 14.766