Pasithorn A Suwanabol1, Ari C Reichstein2, Z Tuba Suzer-Gurtekin3, Jane Forman4, Maria J Silveira5,6, Lona Mody5,6, Arden M Morris7. 1. 1 Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. 2 Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. 3 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. 4 Center for Clinical Management Research , Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. 5 Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. 6 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) , Veterans Affairs Health Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 7. 7 Department of Surgery, S-SPIRE Center, Stanford University , Stanford, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nearly 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients present with potentially incurable (Stage IV) disease, yet their physicians do not integrate cancer treatment with palliative care. Compared with patients treated by primary providers, surgical patients with terminal diseases are significantly less likely to receive palliative or end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives on palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs. DESIGN: This is a convergent mixed methods study using a validated survey instrument from the Critical Care Peer Workgroup of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care Project with additional qualitative questions. SETTINGS: Participants were all current, nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon-perceived barriers to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs were identified. RESULTS: Among 131 Internet survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 76.1% reported no formal education in palliative care, and specifically noted inadequate training in techniques to forgo life-sustaining measures (37.9%) and communication (42.7%). Over half (61.8%) of surgeons cited unrealistic expectations among patients and families as a barrier to care, which also limited discussion of palliation. At the system level, absence of documentation, appropriate processes, and culture hindered the initiation of palliative care. Thematic analysis of open-ended questions confirmed and extended these findings through the following major barriers to palliative and end-of-life care: (1) surgeon knowledge and training; (2) communication challenges; (3) difficulty with prognostication; (4) patient and family factors encompassing unrealistic expectations and discordant preferences; and (5) systemic issues including culture and lack of documentation and appropriate resources. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by the small sample size inherent to Internet surveys, which may contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons valued palliative and end-of-life care but reported multilevel barriers to its provision. These data will inform strategies to reduce these perceived barriers.
BACKGROUND: Nearly 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients present with potentially incurable (Stage IV) disease, yet their physicians do not integrate cancer treatment with palliative care. Compared with patients treated by primary providers, surgical patients with terminal diseases are significantly less likely to receive palliative or end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives on palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs. DESIGN: This is a convergent mixed methods study using a validated survey instrument from the Critical Care Peer Workgroup of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care Project with additional qualitative questions. SETTINGS: Participants were all current, nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon-perceived barriers to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs were identified. RESULTS: Among 131 Internet survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 76.1% reported no formal education in palliative care, and specifically noted inadequate training in techniques to forgo life-sustaining measures (37.9%) and communication (42.7%). Over half (61.8%) of surgeons cited unrealistic expectations among patients and families as a barrier to care, which also limited discussion of palliation. At the system level, absence of documentation, appropriate processes, and culture hindered the initiation of palliative care. Thematic analysis of open-ended questions confirmed and extended these findings through the following major barriers to palliative and end-of-life care: (1) surgeon knowledge and training; (2) communication challenges; (3) difficulty with prognostication; (4) patient and family factors encompassing unrealistic expectations and discordant preferences; and (5) systemic issues including culture and lack of documentation and appropriate resources. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by the small sample size inherent to Internet surveys, which may contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons valued palliative and end-of-life care but reported multilevel barriers to its provision. These data will inform strategies to reduce these perceived barriers.
Entities:
Keywords:
barriers; colorectal cancer; end-of-life; palliative care; surgeon; surgery
Authors: Laurence E McCahill; Geoffrey P Dunn; Anne C Mosenthal; Robert A Milch; Robert S Krouse Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Courtney L Olmsted; Amy M Johnson; Peter Kaboli; Joseph Cullen; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Saket A Kottewar; Dilip Bearelly; Smith Bearelly; E Diane Johnson; David A Fleming Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Megan E V Caram; Samuel R Kaufman; Parth K Modi; Lindsey Herrel; Mary Oerline; Ryan Ross; Ted A Skolarus; Brent K Hollenbeck; Vahakn Shahinian Journal: Urology Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Brent K Hollenbeck; Mary Oerline; Samuel R Kaufman; Megan E V Caram; Stacie B Dusetzina; Andy M Ryan; Vahakn B Shahinian Journal: Urology Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Lindsay K Haines; Allyson C Cook; Justin S Hatchimonji; Vanessa P Ho; Elle L Kalbfell; Kathleen M O'Connell; Jacinta C Robenstine; Mathias Schlögl; Christine C Toevs; Christopher A Jones; Robert S Krouse; Niels D Martin Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Lee A Hugar; Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield; Gary S Winzelberg; Bruce L Jacobs; Benjamin J Davies Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Blanche Blumenthal; Christina W Lee; C Ann Vitous; Alexandria J Robbins; Ana C De Roo; Mary Byrnes; Pasithorn A Suwanabol Journal: Ann Palliat Med Date: 2020-09-10