Literature DB >> 25563701

Patient cost sharing and receipt of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents through medicare part D.

Amy J Davidoff1, Franklin B Hendrick2, Amer M Zeidan1, Maria R Baer1, Bruce C Stuart1, Rahul A Shenolikar1, Steven D Gore1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medicare Part D prescription benefits cover injected medications, normally covered under Part B, when administered outside of physician offices. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) used for chronic anemia management in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are commonly injected in a physician office but can be administered safely at home. In this study, we explored out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and receipt of Part D-covered ESAs in Medicare beneficiaries with MDS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MDS enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D were identified using diagnosis codes from 100% claims from 2006 to 2008. OOP costs for the mean erythropoietin alfa claim were compared for Parts B and D. Multivariable models examined the effect of low-income subsidy (LIS) and other Part D cost sharing on receipt of any ESA and any Part D-covered ESA.
RESULTS: A total of 13,117 (62.9%) of 20,848 patients received ESAs, but only 1,436 (6.9%) had any Part D claim. OOP payment was $348 under Part D versus $161 under Part B. Among patients with ESA use, those with LIS were 4× more likely to receive Part D ESAs (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Few patients with MDS received ESAs through Part D. OOP payments required under Part D were substantially higher than under Part B. Cost sharing, as reflected by LIS receipt, likely affected decisions to prescribe ESAs outside of the physician office. Improved coordination between Part B and D benefits regarding issues of home injection of medications may create incentives that improve patient access and convenience and reduce costs associated with administration.
Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25563701      PMCID: PMC4371123          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  11 in total

1.  Benefit design and specialty drug use.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Grant Lawless; William H Crown; Vincent Willey
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Does reimbursement influence chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients?

Authors:  Mireille Jacobson; A James O'Malley; Craig C Earle; Juliana Pakes; Peter Gaccione; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Jennifer A Palmer; Eric Nadler; Chihui Fang; Peter Ubel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Saving Medicare through patient-centered changes--the case of injectables.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Farroni; Leonard Zwelling; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patient and physician characteristics associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Sheila Weiss Smith; Maria R Baer; Xuehua Ke; Jason M Bierenbaum; Franklin Hendrick; Diane L McNally; Steven D Gore
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Incidence of the myelodysplastic syndromes using a novel claims-based algorithm: high number of uncaptured cases by cancer registries.

Authors:  Christopher R Cogle; Benjamin M Craig; Dana E Rollison; Alan F List
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  How Medicare's payment cuts for cancer chemotherapy drugs changed patterns of treatment.

Authors:  Mireille Jacobson; Craig C Earle; Mary Price; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Patterns of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare beneficiaries with myelodysplastic syndromes and consistency with clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Sheila R Weiss; Maria R Baer; Xuehua Ke; Franklin Hendrick; Amer Zeidan; Steven D Gore
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 9.  Management of RBC-transfusion dependence.

Authors:  Magda Melchert; Alan F List
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2007

10.  The value of specialty oncology drugs.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Anupam B Jena; Darius N Lakdawalla; Jennifer L Malin; Jesse D Malkin; Eric Sun
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subsidies for Oral Chemotherapy and Use of Immunomodulatory Drugs Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Myeloma.

Authors:  Adam J Olszewski; Stacie B Dusetzina; Charles B Eaton; Amy J Davidoff; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 2.  Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Rory M Shallis; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.