Literature DB >> 34342860

Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Rory M Shallis1, Amer M Zeidan2.   

Abstract

No two diagnoses of myelodysplastic syndrome are genuinely alike, owing to differing and dynamic mutational topography and epigenetic aberrancy. Consequently, no two patients with myelodysplastic syndrome are identical and disease-specific and patient-specific factors are considered in formulating the optimal treatment, which includes few that are disease modifying. Age itself should not be an absolute contraindication to therapy, including intensive therapy such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the only curative therapy. However, age associates with an increased prevalence of frailty and comorbidities that must be considered and may preclude a path to cure. Palliative therapies are the mainstay for many patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, which is a disease of older adults with the majority of patients diagnosed at age ≥ 75 years. The older patient requires heightened attention to end organ function/reserve and drug-drug interactions as well as insurance, income, cost, and socioeconomic and psychosocial issues that influence management. Many prior studies have included relatively younger populations or have not specifically performed high-quality subgroup analyses of older patients. In this review, we discuss the available standard-of-care therapies for myelodysplastic syndrome as they specifically relate to the older population and assess the emerging therapeutics that may further the pursuit for personalized treatment and improve both the outcomes and quality of life of the older patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342860     DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00881-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  162 in total

Review 1.  Myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; James W Vardiman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Exclusion of older patients from ongoing clinical trials for hematological malignancies: an evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Registry.

Authors:  Marije E Hamaker; Reinhard Stauder; Barbara C van Munster
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  P Greenberg; C Cox; M M LeBeau; P Fenaux; P Morel; G Sanz; M Sanz; T Vallespi; T Hamblin; D Oscier; K Ohyashiki; K Toyama; C Aul; G Mufti; J Bennett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study.

Authors:  Lazzaro Repetto; Lucia Fratino; Riccardo A Audisio; Antonella Venturino; Walter Gianni; Marina Vercelli; Stefano Parodi; Denise Dal Lago; Flora Gioia; Silvio Monfardini; Matti S Aapro; Diego Serraino; Vittorina Zagonel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patient-reported outcomes for the myelodysplastic syndromes: a new MDS-specific measure of quality of life.

Authors:  Gregory A Abel; Robert Klaassen; Stephanie J Lee; Nancy L Young; Laura Cannella; David P Steensma; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Lionel Adès; Raphael Itzykson; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Quality of life measurement in patients with transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  A J G Jansen; M-L Essink-Bot; E A M Beckers; W C J Hop; M R Schipperus; D J Van Rhenen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Luca Malcovati; Ulrich Germing; Andrea Kuendgen; Matteo G Della Porta; Cristiana Pascutto; Rosangela Invernizzi; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Barbara Hildebrandt; Paolo Bernasconi; Sabine Knipp; Corinna Strupp; Mario Lazzarino; Carlo Aul; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  The genetic and molecular pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rory M Shallis; Rami Ahmad; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  BMT for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: When and Where and How.

Authors:  Akriti G Jain; Hany Elmariah
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.