Literature DB >> 28541791

Subsidies for Oral Chemotherapy and Use of Immunomodulatory Drugs Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Myeloma.

Adam J Olszewski1, Stacie B Dusetzina1, Charles B Eaton1, Amy J Davidoff1, Amal N Trivedi1.   

Abstract

Purpose The low-income subsidy (LIS) substantially lowers out-of-pocket costs for qualifying Medicare Part D beneficiaries who receive orally administered chemotherapy. We examined the association of LIS with the use of novel oral immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; lenalidomide and thalidomide) among beneficiaries with myeloma, who can receive either orally administered or parenteral (bortezomib-based) therapy. Methods Using SEER-Medicare data, we identified Part D beneficiaries diagnosed with myeloma in 2007 to 2011. In multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, we analyzed associations between the LIS and use of IMiD-based therapy, delays between IMiD refills, and select health outcomes during the first year of therapy. Results Among 3,038 beneficiaries, 41% received first-line IMiDs. Median out-of-pocket cost for the first IMiD prescription was $3,178 for LIS nonrecipients and $3 for LIS recipients, whereas the respective median costs for the first year of therapy were $5,623 and $6, respectively. Receipt of the LIS was associated with a 32% higher (95% CI, 16% to 47%) probability of receiving IMiDs among beneficiaries age 75 to 84 years and a significantly lower risk of delays between refills in all age groups (adjusted relative risk, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.92). Duration of therapy did not significantly differ between LIS recipients and nonrecipients (median, 7.6 months). Patients treated with IMiDs had significantly fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations compared with patients receiving bortezomib (without IMiDs), but 1-year overall survival and cumulative Medicare costs were similar. Conclusion Medicare beneficiaries with myeloma who do not receive LISs face a substantial financial barrier to accessing orally administered anticancer therapy, warranting urgent attention from policymakers. Limiting out-of-pocket costs for expensive anticancer drugs like the IMiDs may improve access to oral therapy for patients with myeloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28541791      PMCID: PMC5652870          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   50.717


  38 in total

1.  Comparison of anticancer drug coverage decisions in the United States and United Kingdom: does the evidence support the rhetoric?

Authors:  Anne Mason; Michael Drummond; Scott Ramsey; Jonathan Campbell; Dennis Raisch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  High cost sharing and specialty drug initiation under Medicare Part D: a case study in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jalpa A Doshi; Pengxiang Li; Hairong Huo; Amy R Pettit; Rishab Kumar; Brenda M Weiss; Scott F Huntington
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  The introduction of generic aromatase inhibitors and treatment adherence among Medicare D enrollees.

Authors:  Joan M Neuner; Sailaja Kamaraju; John A Charlson; Erica M Wozniak; Elizabeth C Smith; Alana Biggers; Alicia J Smallwood; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Evolution of Management and Outcomes in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Olszewski; Steven P Treon; Jorge J Castillo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-29

6.  The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  A novel approach to improve health status measurement in observational claims-based studies of cancer treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Ilene H Zuckerman; Naimish Pandya; Franklin Hendrick; Xuehua Ke; Arti Hurria; Stuart M Lichtman; Arif Hussain; Jonathan P Weiner; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Factors Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Initiation and Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Aaron N Winn; Nancy L Keating; Stacie B Dusetzina
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Liu; E Franssen; M I Fitch; E Warner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study.

Authors:  Pierre Wijermans; Martijn Schaafsma; Fabian Termorshuizen; Rianne Ammerlaan; Shulamiet Wittebol; Harm Sinnige; Sonja Zweegman; Marinus van Marwijk Kooy; René van der Griend; Henk Lokhorst; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  17 in total

1.  Patient and provider perspectives on delivery of oral cancer therapies.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber; John V Cox; Hannah M Fullington; Robin T Higashi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-06-20

2.  Undertreatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Authors:  Bita Fakhri; Mark A Fiala; Sascha A Tuchman; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01-31

3.  Adherence to Lenalidomide in Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Hira Mian; Mark Fiala; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-10-09

4.  Use of Charity Financial Assistance for Novel Oral Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Adam J Olszewski; Andrew R Zullo; Christopher R Nering; Justin P Huynh
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Comparative Survival Associated With Use of Targeted vs Nontargeted Therapy in Medicare Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengxiang Li; Jordan Jahnke; Amy R Pettit; Yu-Ning Wong; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-06-05

6.  Patterns of pain medication use associated with reported pain interference in older adults with and without cancer.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Maureen E Canavan; Shelli Feder; Shiyi Wang; Ella Sheinfeld; Erin E Kent; Jennifer Kapo; Carolyn J Presley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  How I treat a refractory myeloma patient who is not eligible for a clinical trial.

Authors:  Siyang Leng; Divaya Bhutani; Suzanne Lentzsch
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 8.  The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Iragorri; Claire de Oliveira; Natalie Fitzgerald; Beverley Essue
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  The Association Between Medicare Low-Income Subsidy and Anticancer Treatment Uptake in Advanced Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Chou; Joel F Farley; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Amber E Proctor; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Stacie B Dusetzina
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Multiple myeloma, race, insurance and treatment.

Authors:  Himanshu Joshi; Sylvia Lin; Kezhen Fei; Anne S Renteria; Hannah Jacobs; Madhu Mazumdar; Sundar Jagannath; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.