Literature DB >> 25561750

Early complications of primary total hip arthroplasty in the supine position with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach.

Tsuyoshi Nakai1, Naxin Liu1, Kazumasa Fudo1, Toshikazu Mohri1, Masaaki Kakiuchi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For total hip arthroplasty (THA), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been developed to reduce incision length, muscle damage, and a shorter hospital stay. However, reduced exposure of anatomical landmarks may result in technical errors and inferior implant survivorships. The aim of this study was to report the short-term results and clinical complications of primary MIS THA in the supine position.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 103 patients who underwent MIS cementless THA with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach (AL) were enrolled. Outcomes data were reviewed at a minimum of 12 months following the procedure. Clinical evaluations were made using the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel hip score. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of a historical series of 98 total hip arthroplasties that had been performed by the same surgeon with use of a posterolateral approach (PL).
RESULTS: In the MIS AL THA group, intraoperative fracture was observed in 6 hips; 3 in greater trochanter and 3 in calcar femoral. One hip was subjected to irrigation because of postoperative infection was suspected. In the PL group, intraoperative fracture was demonstrated in 4 hips in calcar femoral. No postoperative dislocation and no pulmonary embolism or nerve paralysis was observed in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The MIS AL THA did not show a clinically relevant superior outcome compared with the PL THA. When performing MIS AL THA, special attention should pay for prevention of greater trochanter fracture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterolateral approach; Complication; Supine position; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2014        PMID: 25561750      PMCID: PMC4281640          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  12 in total

1.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Use of intraoperative X-rays to optimize component position and leg length during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kace A Ezzet; Julie C McCauley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

4.  Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment.

Authors:  F Pierchon; G Pasquier; A Cotten; C Fontaine; J Clarisse; A Duquennoy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-01

5.  Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; W J Culpepper; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table.

Authors:  Brian A Jewett; Dennis K Collis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  J S Xenos; J J Callaghan; R D Heekin; W J Hopkinson; C G Savory; M S Moore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  C Yang; Q Zhu; Y Han; J Zhu; H Wang; R Cong; D Zhang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; Paul J Duwelius
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jon H M Goosen; Boudewijn J Kollen; René M Castelein; Bart M Kuipers; Cees C Verheyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

1.  The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Louis de Jong; Taco M A L Klem; Tjallingius M Kuijper; Gert R Roukema
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Lateral versus conventional fasciotomy for prevention of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach: a study protocol for a dual-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hiroki Tanabe; Tomonori Baba; Yu Ozaki; Naotake Yanagisawa; Sammy Banno; Taiji Watari; Yasuhiro Homma; Masashi Nagao; Kazuo Kaneko; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Low rate of early periprosthetic fractures in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Clemens Schopper; Bernhard Schauer; Rainer Hochgatterer; Jakob Allerstorfer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-21

4.  Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Core Decompression with Tantalum Rod for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Kyung-Soon Park; Do-Youn Kim; Young-Min Lee; Kamolhuja Eshnazarovich Eshnazarov; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

5.  Hip muscle power recovery after hip replacement using anterior-based muscle-sparing approach in elderly femoral neck fracture: a prospective study in 40 patients.

Authors:  Kulapat Chulsomlee; Paphon Sa-Ngasoongsong; Noratep Kulachote; Norachart Sirisreetreerux; Panithan Tuntiyatorn; Satetha Vasaruchapong; Sorawut Thamyongkit; Chavarat Jarungvittayakon; Siwadol Wongsak; Viroj Kawinwonggowit
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2018-07-11

6.  Improving MiniHip femoral prosthesis positioning using a cross-laser projection system in total hip arthroplasty by an anterolateral supine approach.

Authors:  Hideki Fujii; Tetsuo Hayama; Toshiomi Abe; Motoi Takahashi; Yohei Matsushita; Ryuichi Sato; Takuya Otani; Mitsuru Saito
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Outcomes of the Supine Anterior-based Muscle-sparing Approach for Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tommy Pan; Anuj Mehta; Mark W Mason
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using the Supine Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach.

Authors:  Tommy Pan; Matthew J Bierowski; Tonya S King; Mark W Mason
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-03-24

9.  Comparison of early complications between the use of a cannulated screw locking plate and multiple cancellous screws in the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in young adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wang; Yi Yin; Qingshan Li; Guanjun Sun; Xu Peng; Hua Yin; Yongjie Ye
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Obesity in short stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive supine anterolateral approach-a risk factor for short-term complications?

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Rainer Hochgatterer; Clemens Schopper; Lorenz Pisecky; Jakob Allerstorfer; Antonio Klasan; Tobias Gotterbarm; Bernhard Schauer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.