Mirjam A de Vos1, Albert P Bos2, Frans B Plötz3, Marc van Heerde4, Bert M de Graaff5, Kiek Tates6, Robert D Truog7, Dick L Willems8. 1. Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; m.a.devos@amc.nl. 2. Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 3. Department of Paediatrics, Tergooiziekenhuizen, Hilversum, Netherlands; 4. Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 5. Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 6. Department of Communication and Information Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands; and. 7. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital; Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Retrospective studies show that most parents prefer to share in decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment (LST) from their children. We do not yet know how physicians and parents communicate about these decisions and to what extent parents share in the decision-making process. METHODS: We conducted a prospective exploratory study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. RESULTS: Overall, 27 physicians participated, along with 37 parents of 19 children for whom a decision to withhold or withdraw LST was being considered. Forty-seven conversations were audio recorded, ranging from 1 to 8 meetings per patient. By means of a coding instrument we quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed physicians' and parents' communicative behaviors. On average, physicians spoke 67% of the time, parents 30%, and nurses 3%. All physicians focused primarily on providing medical information, explaining their preferred course of action, and informing parents about the decision being reached by the team. Only in 2 cases were parents asked to share in the decision-making. Despite their intense emotions, most parents made great effort to actively participate in the conversation. They did this by asking for clarifications, offering their preferences, and reacting to the decision being proposed (mostly by expressing their assent). In the few cases where parents strongly preferred LST to be continued, the physicians either gave parents more time or revised the decision. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that parents are able to handle a more active role than they are currently being given. Parents' greatest concern is that their child might suffer.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Retrospective studies show that most parents prefer to share in decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment (LST) from their children. We do not yet know how physicians and parents communicate about these decisions and to what extent parents share in the decision-making process. METHODS: We conducted a prospective exploratory study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. RESULTS: Overall, 27 physicians participated, along with 37 parents of 19 children for whom a decision to withhold or withdraw LST was being considered. Forty-seven conversations were audio recorded, ranging from 1 to 8 meetings per patient. By means of a coding instrument we quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed physicians' and parents' communicative behaviors. On average, physicians spoke 67% of the time, parents 30%, and nurses 3%. All physicians focused primarily on providing medical information, explaining their preferred course of action, and informing parents about the decision being reached by the team. Only in 2 cases were parents asked to share in the decision-making. Despite their intense emotions, most parents made great effort to actively participate in the conversation. They did this by asking for clarifications, offering their preferences, and reacting to the decision being proposed (mostly by expressing their assent). In the few cases where parents strongly preferred LST to be continued, the physicians either gave parents more time or revised the decision. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that parents are able to handle a more active role than they are currently being given. Parents' greatest concern is that their child might suffer.
Authors: Katie M Moynihan; Jennifer M Snaman; Erica C Kaye; Wynne E Morrison; Aaron G DeWitt; Loren D Sacks; Jess L Thompson; Jennifer M Hwang; Valerie Bailey; Deborah A Lafond; Joanne Wolfe; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tessie W October; Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Zoelle B Dizon; Yao I Cheng; Debra L Roter Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Ronald H Dallas; Allison Kimmel; Megan L Wilkins; Sohail Rana; Ana Garcia; Yao I Cheng; Jichuan Wang; Maureen E Lyon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kim Mooney-Doyle; Janet A Deatrick; Connie M Ulrich; Salimah H Meghani; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 2.947