Literature DB >> 25560273

Four decades of finite element analysis of orthopaedic devices: where are we now and what are the opportunities?

Mark Taylor1, Patrick J Prendergast2.   

Abstract

Finite element has been used for more than four decades to study and evaluate the mechanical behaviour total joint replacements. In Huiskes seminal paper "Failed innovation in total hip replacement: diagnosis and proposals for a cure", finite element modelling was one of the potential cures to avoid poorly performing designs reaching the market place. The size and sophistication of models has increased significantly since that paper and a range of techniques are available from predicting the initial mechanical environment through to advanced adaptive simulations including bone adaptation, tissue differentiation, damage accumulation and wear. However, are we any closer to FE becoming an effective screening tool for new devices? This review contains a critical analysis of currently available finite element modelling techniques including (i) development of the basic model, the application of appropriate material properties, loading and boundary conditions, (ii) describing the initial mechanical environment of the bone-implant system, (iii) capturing the time dependent behaviour in adaptive simulations, (iv) the design and implementation of computer based experiments and (v) determining suitable performance metrics. The development of the underlying tools and techniques appears to have plateaued and further advances appear to be limited either by a lack of data to populate the models or the need to better understand the fundamentals of the mechanical and biological processes. There has been progress in the design of computer based experiments. Historically, FE has been used in a similar way to in vitro tests, by running only a limited set of analyses, typically of a single bone segment or joint under idealised conditions. The power of finite element is the ability to run multiple simulations and explore the performance of a device under a variety of conditions. There has been increasing usage of design of experiments, probabilistic techniques and more recently population based modelling to account for patient and surgical variability. In order to have effective screening methods, we need to continue to develop these approaches to examine the behaviour and performance of total joint replacements and benchmark them for devices with known clinical performance. Finite element will increasingly be used in the design, development and pre-clinical testing of total joint replacements. However, simulations must include holistic, closely corroborated, multi-domain analyses which account for real world variability.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25560273     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  15 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Overall Strategy.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Thor F Besier; Jason P Halloran; Carl W Imhauser; Peter J Laz; Tina M Morrison; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  [Digitalization and artificial intelligence in orthopedics and traumatology].

Authors:  K Harren; F Dittrich; F Reinecke; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Commentary on the integration of model sharing and reproducibility analysis to scholarly publishing workflow in computational biomechanics.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Trent M Guess; Jason P Halloran; Luca Modenese; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Darryl G Thelen; Brian R Umberger; Ahmet Erdemir; Trent M Guess; Jason P Halloran; Luca Modenese; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Darryl G Thelen; Brian R Umberger; Brian R Umberger; Ahmet Erdemir; Darryl G Thelen; Trent M Guess; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Luca Modenese; Jason P Halloran
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Real-time synchronous measurement of curing characteristics and polymerization stress in bone cements with a cantilever-beam based instrument.

Authors:  Sri Vikram Palagummi; Forrest A Landis; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Peter J Hunter; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Leslie M Loew; John Middleton; Christopher R Jacobs; Perumal Nithiarasu; Rainlad Löhner; Guowei Wei; Beth A Winkelstein; Victor H Barocas; Farshid Guilak; Joy P Ku; Jennifer L Hicks; Scott L Delp; Michael Sacks; Jeffrey A Weiss; Gerard A Ateshian; Steve A Maas; Andrew D McCulloch; Grace C Y Peng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  The effects of metastatic lesion on the structural determinants of bone: Current clinical and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; David Hackney; Deepak Vashishth; Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics.

Authors:  Lucy H Brunt; Karen A Roddy; Emily J Rayfield; Chrissy L Hammond
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  Finite Element Simulations of Hard-On-Soft Hip Joint Prosthesis Accounting for Dynamic Loads Calculated from a Musculoskeletal Model during Walking.

Authors:  Alessandro Ruggiero; Massimiliano Merola; Saverio Affatato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  The peripheral soft tissues should not be ignored in the finite element models of the human knee joint.

Authors:  Hamid Naghibi Beidokhti; Dennis Janssen; Sebastiaan van de Groes; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.