Literature DB >> 29247253

Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research.

Ahmet Erdemir1, Peter J Hunter2, Gerhard A Holzapfel3,4, Leslie M Loew5, John Middleton6, Christopher R Jacobs7, Perumal Nithiarasu8, Rainlad Löhner9, Guowei Wei10, Beth A Winkelstein11, Victor H Barocas12, Farshid Guilak13, Joy P Ku14, Jennifer L Hicks14, Scott L Delp14,15, Michael Sacks16, Jeffrey A Weiss17, Gerard A Ateshian18, Steve A Maas17, Andrew D McCulloch19, Grace C Y Peng20.   

Abstract

The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29247253      PMCID: PMC5821103          DOI: 10.1115/1.4038768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  46 in total

Review 1.  Computational modeling of arterial biomechanics: insights into pathogenesis and treatment of vascular disease.

Authors:  D A Steinman; D A Vorp; C R Ethier
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Reproducibility of research in biophysics.

Authors:  Les Loew; Dorothy Beckett; Edward H Egelman; Suzanne Scarlata
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Bernard De Bruyne; Gianluca Pontone; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Mark A Hlatky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jurrus; Dave Engel; Keith Star; Kyle Monson; Juan Brandi; Lisa E Felberg; David H Brookes; Leighton Wilson; Jiahui Chen; Karina Liles; Minju Chun; Peter Li; David W Gohara; Todd Dolinsky; Robert Konecny; David R Koes; Jens Erik Nielsen; Teresa Head-Gordon; Weihua Geng; Robert Krasny; Guo-Wei Wei; Michael J Holst; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser; Ray W Ogden; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Multiscale computational models of complex biological systems.

Authors:  Joseph Walpole; Jason A Papin; Shayn M Peirce
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Chondrocyte deformations as a function of tibiofemoral joint loading predicted by a generalized high-throughput pipeline of multi-scale simulations.

Authors:  Scott C Sibole; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in the activation and function of the ankle plantar flexor muscles due to gait retraining in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Trisha M Kesar; Darcy S Reisman; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Overall Strategy.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Thor F Besier; Jason P Halloran; Carl W Imhauser; Peter J Laz; Tina M Morrison; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  A modeling algorithm for exploring the architecture and construction of bird nests.

Authors:  Hadass R Jessel; Lior Aharoni; Sol Efroni; Ido Bachelet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we?

Authors:  Frits Me Franssen; Peter Alter; Nadav Bar; Birke J Benedikter; Stella Iurato; Dieter Maier; Michael Maxheim; Fabienne K Roessler; Martijn A Spruit; Claus F Vogelmeier; Emiel Fm Wouters; Bernd Schmeck
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 4.  Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Lealem Mulugeta; Joy P Ku; Andrew Drach; Marc Horner; Tina M Morrison; Grace C Y Peng; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; William W Lytton; Jerry G Myers
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.