Literature DB >> 25558466

Evaluation of Multi-Atlas Label Fusion for In Vivo MRI Orbital Segmentation.

Swetasudha Panda1, Andrew J Asman1, Shweta P Khare2, Lindsey Thompson3, Louise A Mawn4, Seth A Smith5, Bennett A Landman6.   

Abstract

Multi-atlas methods have been successful for brain segmentation, but their application to smaller anatomies remains relatively unexplored. We evaluate 7 statistical and voting-based label fusion algorithms (and 6 additional variants) to segment the optic nerves, eye globes and chiasm. For non-local STAPLE, we evaluate different intensity similarity measures (including mean square difference, locally normalized cross correlation, and a hybrid approach). Each algorithm is evaluated in terms of the Dice overlap and symmetric surface distance metrics. Finally, we evaluate refinement of label fusion results using a learning based correction method for consistent bias correction and Markov random field regularization. The multi-atlas labeling pipelines were evaluated on a cohort of 35 subjects including both healthy controls and patients. Across all three structures, NLSS with a mixed weighting type provided the most consistent results; for the optic nerve NLSS resulted in a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.81, mean surface distance of 0.41 mm and Hausdorff distance 2.18 mm for the optic nerves. Joint label fusion resulted in slightly superior median performance for the optic nerves (0.82, 0.39 mm and 2.15 mm), but slightly worse on the globes. The fully automated multi-atlas labeling approach provides robust segmentations of orbital structures on MRI even in patients for whom significant atrophy (optic nerve head drusen) or inflammation (multiple sclerosis) is present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Label Fusion; MRI; Multi-Atlas; Optic Nerve; Segmentation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25558466      PMCID: PMC4280790          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.2.024002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  24 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Daniel B Russakoff; Calvin R Maurer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Evaluation of multiple-atlas-based strategies for segmentation of the thyroid gland in head and neck CT images for IMRT.

Authors:  A Chen; K J Niermann; M A Deeley; B M Dawant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The Java Image Science Toolkit (JIST) for rapid prototyping and publishing of neuroimaging software.

Authors:  Blake C Lucas; John A Bogovic; Aaron Carass; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2010-03

6.  A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Sandhitsu R Das; Jung Wook Suh; Murat Altinay; John Pluta; Caryne Craige; Brian Avants; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Optimal weights for multi-atlas label fusion.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Jung Wook Suh; John Pluta; Murat Altinay; Paul Yushkevich
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

8.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain.

Authors:  B B Avants; C L Epstein; M Grossman; J C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration.

Authors:  Arno Klein; Jesper Andersson; Babak A Ardekani; John Ashburner; Brian Avants; Ming-Chang Chiang; Gary E Christensen; D Louis Collins; James Gee; Pierre Hellier; Joo Hyun Song; Mark Jenkinson; Claude Lepage; Daniel Rueckert; Paul Thompson; Tom Vercauteren; Roger P Woods; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improved Automatic Optic Nerve Radius Estimation from High Resolution MRI.

Authors:  Robert L Harrigan; Alex K Smith; Louise A Mawn; Seth A Smith; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

2.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Structural-Functional Relationships Between Eye Orbital Imaging Biomarkers and Clinical Visual Assessments.

Authors:  Xiuya Yao; Shikha Chaganti; Kunal P Nabar; Katrina Nelson; Andrew Plassard; Rob L Harrigan; Louise A Mawn; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Disambiguating the optic nerve from the surrounding cerebrospinal fluid: Application to MS-related atrophy.

Authors:  Robert L Harrigan; Andrew J Plassard; Frederick W Bryan; Gabriela Caires; Louise A Mawn; Lindsey M Dethrage; Siddharama Pawate; Robert L Galloway; Seth A Smith; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Multi-Scale Hippocampal Parcellation Improves Atlas-Based Segmentation Accuracy.

Authors:  Andrew J Plassard; Maureen McHugo; Stephan Heckers; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

Review 6.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Constructing a statistical atlas of the radii of the optic nerve and cerebrospinal fluid sheath in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Robert L Harrigan; Andrew J Plassard; Louise A Mawn; Robert L Galloway; Seth A Smith; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  Automated, open-source segmentation of the Hippocampus and amygdala with the open Vanderbilt archive of the temporal lobe.

Authors:  Andrew J Plassard; Shunxing Bao; Maureen McHugo; Lori Beason-Held; Jennifer U Blackford; Stephan Heckers; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.130

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.