Literature DB >> 21237273

A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.

Hongzhi Wang1, Sandhitsu R Das, Jung Wook Suh, Murat Altinay, John Pluta, Caryne Craige, Brian Avants, Paul A Yushkevich.   

Abstract

We propose a simple but generally applicable approach to improving the accuracy of automatic image segmentation algorithms relative to manual segmentations. The approach is based on the hypothesis that a large fraction of the errors produced by automatic segmentation are systematic, i.e., occur consistently from subject to subject, and serves as a wrapper method around a given host segmentation method. The wrapper method attempts to learn the intensity, spatial and contextual patterns associated with systematic segmentation errors produced by the host method on training data for which manual segmentations are available. The method then attempts to correct such errors in segmentations produced by the host method on new images. One practical use of the proposed wrapper method is to adapt existing segmentation tools, without explicit modification, to imaging data and segmentation protocols that are different from those on which the tools were trained and tuned. An open-source implementation of the proposed wrapper method is provided, and can be applied to a wide range of image segmentation problems. The wrapper method is evaluated with four host brain MRI segmentation methods: hippocampus segmentation using FreeSurfer (Fischl et al., 2002); hippocampus segmentation using multi-atlas label fusion (Artaechevarria et al., 2009); brain extraction using BET (Smith, 2002); and brain tissue segmentation using FAST (Zhang et al., 2001). The wrapper method generates 72%, 14%, 29% and 21% fewer erroneously segmented voxels than the respective host segmentation methods. In the hippocampus segmentation experiment with multi-atlas label fusion as the host method, the average Dice overlap between reference segmentations and segmentations produced by the wrapper method is 0.908 for normal controls and 0.893 for patients with mild cognitive impairment. Average Dice overlaps of 0.964, 0.905 and 0.951 are obtained for brain extraction, white matter segmentation and gray matter segmentation, respectively.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21237273      PMCID: PMC3049832          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  42 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Owen T Carmichael; Howard A Aizenstein; Simon W Davis; James T Becker; Paul M Thompson; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Yanxi Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Continuous medial representation for anatomical structures.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Hui Zhang; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set.

Authors:  Audrey H Zhuang; Daniel J Valentino; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Constrained Gaussian mixture model framework for automatic segmentation of MR brain images.

Authors:  Hayit Greenspan; Amit Ruf; Jacob Goldberger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Adaptive Markov modeling for mutual-information-based, unsupervised MRI brain-tissue classification.

Authors:  Suyash P Awate; Tolga Tasdizen; Norman Foster; Ross T Whitaker
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Hippocampus-specific fMRI group activation analysis using the continuous medial representation.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John A Detre; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; María A Fernández-Seara; Kathy Z Tang; Angela Hoang; Marc Korczykowski; Hui Zhang; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Automated extraction of the cortical sulci based on a supervised learning approach.

Authors:  Zhuowen Tu; Songfeng Zheng; Alan L Yuille; Allan L Reiss; Rebecca A Dutton; Agatha D Lee; Albert M Galaburda; Ivo Dinov; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A comparison of methods for the automated calculation of volumes and atrophy rates in the hippocampus.

Authors:  J Barnes; J Foster; R G Boyes; T Pepple; E K Moore; J M Schott; C Frost; R I Scahill; N C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  78 in total

1.  In vivo analysis of hippocampal subfield atrophy in mild cognitive impairment via semi-automatic segmentation of T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  John Pluta; Paul Yushkevich; Sandhitsu Das; David Wolk
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Measuring longitudinal change in the hippocampal formation from in vivo high-resolution T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Sandhitsu R Das; Brian B Avants; John Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Jung W Suh; Michael W Weiner; Susanne G Mueller; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Assessing hippocampal development and language in early childhood: Evidence from a new application of the Automatic Segmentation Adapter Tool.

Authors:  Joshua K Lee; Christine W Nordahl; David G Amaral; Aaron Lee; Marjorie Solomon; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Deformable templates guided discriminative models for robust 3D brain MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Cheng-Yi Liu; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

5.  Local label learning (LLL) for subcortical structure segmentation: application to hippocampus segmentation.

Authors:  Yongfu Hao; Tianyao Wang; Xinqing Zhang; Yunyun Duan; Chunshui Yu; Tianzi Jiang; Yong Fan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Robust optic nerve segmentation on clinically acquired computed tomography.

Authors:  Robert L Harrigan; Swetasudha Panda; Andrew J Asman; Katrina M Nelson; Shikha Chaganti; Michael P DeLisi; Benjamin C W Yvernault; Seth A Smith; Robert L Galloway; Louise A Mawn; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-17

7.  Multiseg pipeline: automatic tissue segmentation of brain MR images with subject-specific atlases.

Authors:  Kevin Pham; Xiao Yang; Marc Niethammer; Juan C Prieto; Martin Styner
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-15

8.  Robust Optic Nerve Segmentation on Clinically Acquired CT.

Authors:  Swetasudha Panda; Andrew J Asman; Michael P Delisi; Louise A Mawn; Robert L Galloway; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

9.  Groupwise multi-atlas segmentation of the spinal cord's internal structure.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Frederick W Bryan; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Clinical Application of Automatic Segmentation of Medial Temporal Lobe Subregions in Prodromal and Dementia-Level Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Eske Christiane Gertje; John Pluta; Sandhitsu Das; Lauren Mancuso; Dasha Kliot; Paul Yushkevich; David Wolk
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.