Literature DB >> 25557128

Effect of warning statements in e-cigarette advertisements: an experiment with young adults in the United States.

Ashley Sanders-Jackson1, Nina C Schleicher1, Stephen P Fortmann1,2, Lisa Henriksen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This on-line experiment examined whether the addition of ingredient- or industry-themed warning statements in television advertisements for e-cigarettes would affect young adults' craving for and risk perceptions of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes, as well as intent to purchase e-cigarettes.
DESIGN: Advertisements for two leading e-cigarette brands were edited to contain a warning statement about product ingredients or about the tobacco industry. Participants were assigned randomly to one of eight treatments or one of two brand-specific control conditions without any warning statement. PARTICIPANTS: Young adults (n=900, aged 18-34 years) in a web panel were recruited from three groups: recent e-cigarette users, current smokers who used combustible cigarettes exclusively and non-users of either product. MEASUREMENTS: Craving and risk perceptions (addictiveness, harmful to health in general, harmful to others) were measured separately for e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. The Juster scale measured intention to purchase e-cigarettes.
FINDINGS: Exposure to both types of warnings was associated with lower craving for e-cigarettes among e-cigarette users and smokers who experienced any craving (P<0.01) and lower intention to purchase among all participants (P<0.001). Only exposure to ingredient-themed warnings was associated with lower craving for combustible cigarettes (P<0.05). Participants who saw industry-themed warnings reported greater perceptions of general harm (P<0.001), but also rated e-cigarettes as less addictive than the control conditions (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The addition of ingredient- or industry-themed warning statements to e-cigarette television advertising similarly reduces craving and purchase intent for e-cigarettes, but has inconsistent effects on perceived risks.
© 2015 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advertising; craving; e-cigarettes; intention to purchase; perceived risk; warning labels

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25557128      PMCID: PMC5113715          DOI: 10.1111/add.12838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; A McNeill; R Borland; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effects of repeated days of smoking cue exposure on urge to smoke and physiological reactivity.

Authors:  Robert Miranda; Damaris J Rohsenow; Peter M Monti; Jennifer Tidey; Lara Ray
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Individual differences in motivational activation influence responses to pictures of taboo products.

Authors:  Annie Lang; Narine Yegiyan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Smoking cues in a virtual world provoke craving in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Stephen B Baumann; Michael A Sayette
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2006-12

Review 6.  Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone; Quinn Grundy; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: evidence from industry documents.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Electronic cigarette use by college students.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study.

Authors:  Pasquale Caponnetto; Davide Campagna; Fabio Cibella; Jaymin B Morjaria; Massimo Caruso; Cristina Russo; Riccardo Polosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  A fMRI study on the impact of advertising for flavored e-cigarettes on susceptible young adults.

Authors:  Kathleen A Garrison; Stephanie S O'Malley; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Effects of exposure to anti-vaping public service announcements among current smokers and dual users of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Vaughan W Rees; Justin Rodgers; Emeka Agudile; Natasha A Sokol; Kyeungyeun Yie; Ashley Sanders-Jackson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Effects of E-cigarette Advertising Message Form and Cues on Cessation Intention: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Catherine L Jo; Seth M Noar; Brian G Southwell; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 4.  E-Cigarette Marketing and Communication: How E-Cigarette Companies Market E-Cigarettes and the Public Engages with E-cigarette Information.

Authors:  Lauren Collins; Allison M Glasser; Haneen Abudayyeh; Jennifer L Pearson; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  The Effects of Varying Electronic Cigarette Warning Label Design Features On Attention, Recall, and Product Perceptions Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Andrea Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Eric N Lindblom; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

6.  Systematic Review of Health Communication for Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Seth M Noar; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

Review 7.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Effect of e-cigarette advertisement themes on hypothetical e-cigarette purchasing in price-responsive adolescents.

Authors:  Andrew J Barnes; Rose S Bono; Alyssa K Rudy; Cosima Hoetger; Nicole E Nicksic; Caroline O Cobb
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Testing messages about comparative risk of electronic cigarettes and combusted cigarettes.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Daniel Owusu; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Adolescents' receptivity to E-cigarette harms messages delivered using text messaging.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Casey Horvitz; Allison J Lazard; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.