Literature DB >> 2555504

Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.

B J O'Brien.   

Abstract

A sample of 56 general practitioners were asked to rate, on a percentage scale, 23 words or phrases which denote frequency or likelihood. The hypothetical context of the exercise was that of communicating to patients the probability of a side-effect (headache) arising from an unspecified prescription medicine. Median phrase ratings ranged from 'never' at 0% to 'certain' at 95% with a 50% rating given to the phrase 'reasonable chance'. Despite relatively large variance in ratings between respondents, the median ratings of a number of phrases were similar, and some identical, to other studies from different medical professionals. Although the clinical context in which a given expression of probability is used may affect its meaning, the results are encouraging and suggest that phrases denoting likelihood might be systematically codified to enhance communication between doctor and patient. To move towards this objective more research is needed to evaluate how patients interpret expressions of probability, and the relative effectiveness of different modes of communicating likelihood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2555504      PMCID: PMC1711769     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  8 in total

1.  Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts.

Authors:  R E Mapes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  What do we mean by "usually"?

Authors:  J H Toogood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Numbers are better than words. Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine.

Authors:  M A Nakao; S Axelrod
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Expressions of probability: words and numbers.

Authors:  G D Bryant; G R Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Between never and always.

Authors:  R M Kenney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Assessment of patients' preferences for therapeutic outcomes.

Authors:  S A Eraker; H C Sox
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.

Authors:  A Kong; G O Barnett; F Mosteller; C Youtz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Risk communication in the patient-health professional relationship.

Authors:  S Buetow; J Cantrill; B Sibbald
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1998-09

2.  A little 'suspect'?

Authors:  Raymond Ringland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  How do parents of babies interpret qualitative expressions of probability?

Authors:  N J Shaw; P R Dear
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community.

Authors:  E A Lomotan; G Michel; Z Lin; R N Shiffman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-08-10

6.  Use of modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: is there a different understanding between pathologists and treating physicians?

Authors:  V G Prieto; R T Vollmer; C R Shea
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.535

Review 7.  Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Valerie F Reyna; Angela Fagerlin; Isaac Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-08-02

8.  Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Yang Liu; Qiaozhu Mei; Frank J Manion; Ulysses J Balis; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

9.  The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Annette M O'Connor; Elizabeth Drake; Jennifer Biggs; Valerie Hum; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Reporting, presentation and wording of recommendations in clinical practice guideline for gout: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Nan Yang; Yang Yu; Anqi Zhang; Janne Estill; Xiaoqin Wang; Mingfu Zheng; Qi Zhou; Jingyi Zhang; Xufei Luo; Changli Qian; Yifang Mao; Qi Wang; Yantao Yang; Yaolong Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.