Literature DB >> 7052402

Assessment of patients' preferences for therapeutic outcomes.

S A Eraker, H C Sox.   

Abstract

We sought to characterize patients' preferences in drug therapy decisions with uncertain outcomes by analyzing their responses to hypothetical therapeutic scenarios. In each scenario, the patient chose between two drugs with equivalent effects, one having two possible outcomes occurring by chance (uncertain outcome) and the other having a single outcome (certain outcome). Most patients chose a certain and intermediate therapeutic effect rather than taking a chance between no effect and a very large favorable effect. When the outcomes were adverse drug effects, there was a strong opposite trend. Rather than preferring a certain and intermediate adverse drug effect, most patients were willing to risk a possible severe drug side effect in order to have a chance of experiencing no adverse reaction. Thus, patients' willingness to accept risks in therapy decisions involving uncertain outcomes may depend on whether the outcomes are favorable or unfavorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7052402     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8100100105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  15 in total

1.  Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.

Authors:  A E Clarke; M K Goldstein; D Michelson; A M Garber; L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Risk preference and laboratory test selection.

Authors:  S D Nightingale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.

Authors:  B J O'Brien
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-03

5.  From bad to worse: striatal coding of the relative value of painful decisions.

Authors:  Andrew M Brooks; V S Chandrasekhar Pammi; Charles Noussair; C Monica Capra; Jan B Engelmann; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

7.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patients' therapeutic preferences in an ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  G J Povar; M Mantell; L A Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Women's and physicians' utilities for health outcomes in estrogen replacement therapy.

Authors:  M M Holmes; D R Rovner; M L Rothert; A S Elstein; G B Holzman; R B Hoppe; W P Metheny; M M Ravitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient's preferences for health scenarios associated with hepatitis C and its treatment.

Authors:  Fabio Tinè
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.