Mbabazi Kariisa1, Eric Seiber2. 1. Ohio Department of Health, Violence and Injury Prevention Program, Columbus, OH ; The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Columbus, OH. 2. The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Columbus, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies have documented a disproportionate burden of chronic diseases in Appalachia, showing the area to be underserved by the health-care system. Nothing is known about how the health status of the Appalachian population compares with other rural or non-rural populations in the same state. We examined the associations among county type, health insurance category, and health outcomes in poorer adult Ohioans. METHODS: We obtained data from the 2008 Ohio Family Health Survey, a complex landline- and cell phone-based survey of 50,944 noninstitutionalized households. We constructed bivariate analyses examining health status measures across various insurance categories and metropolitan, suburban, rural, and Appalachian counties in Ohio. RESULTS: Medicaid enrollees living in Appalachian and rural counties tended to be in poorer health and have a greater prevalence of smoking than non-Medicaid enrollees. Within rural and Appalachian regions, Medicaid enrollees were more likely than non-Medicaid enrollees to have lower self-rated health (54.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 44.1, 65.5 in rural regions and 52.1%, 95% CI 44.7, 59.5 in Appalachian regions). Appalachian and rural Medicaid enrollees were at an increased likelihood of having several chronic diseases compared with non-Medicaid enrollees. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that rural and Ohio Appalachian Medicaid enrollees were more likely to have hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and overall poorer health than non-Medicaid enrollees. These findings have important policy implications for health-care reform, highlighting regional disparities in provider coverage. These underserved regions would need an increase in the provider base to positively impact proposed Medicaid expansion programs.
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies have documented a disproportionate burden of chronic diseases in Appalachia, showing the area to be underserved by the health-care system. Nothing is known about how the health status of the Appalachian population compares with other rural or non-rural populations in the same state. We examined the associations among county type, health insurance category, and health outcomes in poorer adult Ohioans. METHODS: We obtained data from the 2008 Ohio Family Health Survey, a complex landline- and cell phone-based survey of 50,944 noninstitutionalized households. We constructed bivariate analyses examining health status measures across various insurance categories and metropolitan, suburban, rural, and Appalachian counties in Ohio. RESULTS: Medicaid enrollees living in Appalachian and rural counties tended to be in poorer health and have a greater prevalence of smoking than non-Medicaid enrollees. Within rural and Appalachian regions, Medicaid enrollees were more likely than non-Medicaid enrollees to have lower self-rated health (54.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 44.1, 65.5 in rural regions and 52.1%, 95% CI 44.7, 59.5 in Appalachian regions). Appalachian and rural Medicaid enrollees were at an increased likelihood of having several chronic diseases compared with non-Medicaid enrollees. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that rural and Ohio Appalachian Medicaid enrollees were more likely to have hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and overall poorer health than non-Medicaid enrollees. These findings have important policy implications for health-care reform, highlighting regional disparities in provider coverage. These underserved regions would need an increase in the provider base to positively impact proposed Medicaid expansion programs.
Authors: Nakela L Cook; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Edward Guadagnoli; Bruce E Landon Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jennifer E Devoe; Alia Baez; Heather Angier; Lisa Krois; Christine Edlund; Patricia A Carney Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Phyllis A Wingo; Thomas C Tucker; Patricia M Jamison; Howard Martin; Colleen McLaughlin; Rana Bayakly; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Pat Colsher; Robert Indian; Karen Knight; Stacey Neloms; Reda Wilson; Thomas B Richards Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Steven M Asch; Eve A Kerr; Joan Keesey; John L Adams; Claude M Setodji; Shaista Malik; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245