Literature DB >> 16540615

Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care?

Steven M Asch1, Eve A Kerr, Joan Keesey, John L Adams, Claude M Setodji, Shaista Malik, Elizabeth A McGlynn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: American adults frequently do not receive recommended health care. The extent to which the quality of health care varies among sociodemographic groups is unknown.
METHODS: We used data from medical records and telephone interviews of a random sample of people living in 12 communities to assess the quality of care received by those who had made at least one visit to a health care provider during the previous two years. We constructed aggregate scores from 439 indicators of the quality of care for 30 chronic and acute conditions and for disease prevention. We estimated the rates at which members of different sociodemographic subgroups received recommended care, with adjustment for the number of chronic and acute conditions, use of health care services, and other sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, participants received 54.9 percent of recommended care. Even after adjustment, there was only moderate variation in quality-of-care scores among sociodemographic subgroups. Women had higher overall scores than men (56.6 percent vs. 52.3 percent, P<0.001), and participants below the age of 31 years had higher scores than those over the age of 64 years (57.5 percent vs. 52.1 percent, P<0.001). Blacks (57.6 percent) and Hispanics (57.5 percent) had slightly higher scores than whites (54.1 percent, P<0.001 for both comparisons). Those with annual household incomes over 50,000 dollars had higher scores than those with incomes of less than 15,000 dollars (56.6 percent vs. 53.1 percent, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The differences among sociodemographic subgroups in the observed quality of health care are small in comparison with the gap for each subgroup between observed and desirable quality of health care. Quality-improvement programs that focus solely on reducing disparities among sociodemographic subgroups may miss larger opportunities to improve care. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540615     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa044464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  142 in total

1.  Education, income, and incident heart failure in post-menopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Therapy Trials.

Authors:  Rashmee U Shah; Marilyn A Winkleby; Linda Van Horn; Lawrence S Phillips; Charles B Eaton; Lisa W Martin; Milagros C Rosal; Joann E Manson; Hongyan Ning; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Liviu Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Implementation of electronic medical records: effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver; Jan Barnsley; Richard H Glazier; Rahim Moineddin; Bart J Harvey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Two countries divided by a common language: health systems in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Monica Desai; Bernard Rachet; Michel P Coleman; Martin McKee
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Analyzing national health reform strategies with a dynamic simulation model.

Authors:  Bobby Milstein; Jack Homer; Gary Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians.

Authors:  Leah Zallman; Jun Ma; Lan Xiao; Karen E Lasser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Characteristics of Academic Detailing: Results of a Literature Review.

Authors:  Thomas J Van Hoof; Lisa G Harrison; Nicole E Miller; Maryanne S Pappas; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-11

7.  Guideline-concordant management of opioid therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and uninfected veterans.

Authors:  Julie R Gaither; Joseph L Goulet; William C Becker; Stephen Crystal; E Jennifer Edelman; Kirsha Gordon; Robert D Kerns; David Rimland; Melissa Skanderson; Daniel F Weisberg; Amy C Justice; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Caries treatment in a dental practice-based research network: movement toward stated evidence-based treatment.

Authors:  Gregg H Gilbert; Valeria V Gordan; Ellen M Funkhouser; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Vibeke Qvist; Gerald Anderson; Donald Worley
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.383

9.  Interpreting and implementing the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV testing in health-care settings.

Authors:  Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Association of socioeconomic and demographic factors with utilization of rheumatology subspecialty care in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; JoAnn Zell Gillis; Laura Trupin; Patricia Katz; Pantelis Panopalis; Lindsey A Criswell; Edward Yelin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.