| Literature DB >> 25551809 |
Ying Zhang1, Xinjian Yang2, Yang Wang3, Jian Liu4, Chuanhui Li5, Linkai Jing6, Shengzhang Wang7, Haiyun Li8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the impact of morphological and hemodynamic factors on the rupture of matched-pairs of ruptured-unruptured intracranial aneurysms on one patient's ipsilateral anterior circulation with 3D reconstruction model and computational fluid dynamic method simulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25551809 PMCID: PMC4301794 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-014-0253-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Figure 1Visualization of 20 multiple aneurysms pairs. Double arrows show the ruptured aneurysms while single arrows show the unruptured aneurysms.
Clinical characteristics of these 20 patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HBP, BH | MCA*, C5 | 4 | Bled-site clipping | ||
| 2 | C7*, MCA | 1 | Bled-site coiling | |||
| 3 | HBP, AS, DVT | C7*, C6 | 2 | Bled-site coiling | ||
| 4 | HPL, PKD | C6* , C7 | 2 | Bled-site coiling | ||
| 5 | D | DM, HPL, CI, DVT | C7*, C6 | 2 | Bled-site clipping | |
| 6 | C6*, MCA | 2 | Bled-site coiling | |||
| 7 | D | HBP | ACA*, C5 | 2 | Bled-site coiling | |
| 8 | S | HHCY | C7*, C6 | 2 | Bled-site clipping | |
| 9 | HBP | C7*, MCA | ACA | 2 | Two-stage treatment | |
| 10 | HBP | MCA*, C7 | 3 | Bled-site coiling | ||
| 11 | C7*, C4 | C4 | 1 | No operation | ||
| 12 | S,D | HBP, DVT | ACoA*, C6 | 3 | Bled-site coiling | |
| 13 | S | HBP, HPL,HHCY, AS, DVT, | C7*, MCA | 3 | Bled-site coiling | |
| 14 | HBP, HPL, CHD | C7*, MCA | C7 | 2 | Bled-site coiling | |
| 15 | HBP, DM, AS | C7*, MCA | C7 | 2 | Bled-side clipping | |
| 16 | HBP, HHCY, HD | C7*, C4 | C7, C4 | 3 | No operation | |
| 17 | HBP, HPL | C7*, ACoA | 3 | Bled-side clipping | ||
| 18 | HBP | MCA*, C7 | C7 | 3 | Two-stage treatment | |
| 19 | HBP, DVT | C7*, MCA | 1 | Bled-side clipping | ||
| 20 | D | HHCY, AS, DVT | ACoA*, C7 | BA | 1 | Bled-side clipping |
S/D, Smoker/drinker; HBP, Hypertension; BH, Brain hernia; AS, Atherosclerosis ; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; HPL, Hyperlipidemia; PKD, Polycystic kidney disease; DM, Diabetes mellitus; CI, Cerebral infarction; HHCY, Hyperhomocysteinemia; CHD, Coronary heart disease;
†the Bouthillier classification of internal carotid artery (ICA) segments: C4, Cavernous; C5, Clinoid; C6, Ophthalmic; C7, Communicating; MCA, Middle cerebral artery; ACA, Anterior cerebral artery; ACoA, Anterior communicating artery;
#coexisting aneurysms on the contralateral side of anterior circulation or vertebrobasilar artery; BA, basilar artery.
*the ruptured group.
Relative locations and morphologic factors
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Relative location | ||||
| Distal (%) | 20 (50) | 11 (55) | 9 (45) | 0.824 |
| Proximal (%) | 20 (50) | 9 (45) | 11 (55) | |
| Morphology type | ||||
| Lateral (%) | 15 (37.5) | 6 (30) | 9 (45) | 0.581 |
| Bifurcation (%) | 25 (62.5) | 14 (70) | 11 (55) | |
| Regular | 22 (55) | 5 (25) | 17 (85) | 0.002 |
| Irregular | 18 (45) | 15 (75) | 3 (15) | |
| Maximum height, mm | 3.94 (1.977) | 4.68 (1.605) | 3.20 (2.076) | 0.041 |
| Neck width, mm | 3.58 (1.308) | 3.77 (1.468) | 3.39 (1.131) | 0.351 |
| Surface area, mm2 | 32.20 (38.809) | 42.82 (41.895) | 27.14 (15.980) | 0.062 |
| Volume,mm3 | 20.85 (41.064) | 31.18 (43.944) | 16.08 (14.697) | 0.108 |
| Aspect ratio | 1.11 (0.399) | 1.31 (0.402) | 0.92 (0.290) | 0.004 |
The comparisons of maximum height and aspect ratio between the two groups were of significant differences (p < 0.05). (‡, McNemar’s test, paired-sample t test or Wilcoxon’s sign rank test as appropriate).
Hemodynamic factors
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| WSSmax, Pa | 53.72 (26.075) | 55.65 (32.700) | 51.78 (17.845) | 0.607 |
| WSSmin, Pa | 0.75 (1.268) | 0.28 (0.289) | 1.22 (1.658) | 0.020 |
| TAWSS, Pa | 13.87 (8.774) | 12.72 (10.234) | 15.02 (7.105) | 0.392 |
| OSI, Pa | 0.0090 (0.00940) | 0.0104 (0.02054) | 0.0061 (0.00871) | 0.156 |
| LSA,% | 0.40 (4.344) | 2.55 (16.536) | 0.12 (1.044) | 0.011 |
| Flow stability | ||||
| Stable (%) | 14 (35) | 6 (30) | 8 (40) | 0.754 |
| Unstable (%) | 26 (65) | 14 (70) | 12 (60) | |
| Flow complexity | ||||
| Simple (%) | 11 (27.5) | 3 (15) | 8 (40) | 0.125 |
| Complex (%) | 29 (72.5) | 17 (85) | 12 (60) | |
| WSSmax location | ||||
| Neck (%) | 33 (82.5) | 17 (85) | 16 (80) | 1.000 |
| Dome (%) | 7 (17.5) | 3 (15) | 4 (20) | |
| WSSmin location | ||||
| Neck (%) | 9 (22.5) | 1 (5) | 8 (40) | 0.039 |
| Dome (%) | 31 (77.5) | 19 (95) | 12 (60) | |
The comparisons of WSSmin, LSA and WSSmin location on the aneurysms between the two groups were of significant differences (p < 0.05). (‡, paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon’s sign rank test or McNemar’s test as appropriate).
Figure 2Visualization of the wall shear stress (WSS) of 2 representative aneurysms pairs (case 1, left; case 2, right; upper, at the systolic peak; lower, at the diastolic end). Double arrows show the ruptured aneurysms while single arrows show the unruptured aneurysms. Case 1 has aneurysms on ICA C7 (duty site) and MCA. Case 2 has aneurysms on ICA C7 and ACoA (duty site). The ruptured aneurysms have lower WSS on the dome and more low WSS area.