Felicitas J Detmer1, Bong Jae Chung2, Fernando Mut2, Martin Slawski3, Farid Hamzei-Sichani4, Christopher Putman5, Carlos Jiménez6, Juan R Cebral2. 1. Bioengineering Department, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. fdetmer@gmu.edu. 2. Bioengineering Department, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. 3. Statistics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA. 5. Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA. 6. Neurosurgery Department, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Unruptured cerebral aneurysms pose a dilemma for physicians who need to weigh the risk of a devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage against the risk of surgery or endovascular treatment and their complications when deciding on a treatment strategy. A prediction model could potentially support such treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a model for aneurysm rupture based on hemodynamic and geometric parameters, aneurysm location, and patient gender and age. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 1061 patients were used for image-based computational fluid dynamics and shape characterization of 1631 aneurysms for training an aneurysm rupture probability model using logistic group Lasso regression. The model's discrimination and calibration were internally validated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration plots. RESULTS: The final model retained 11 hemodynamic and 12 morphological variables, aneurysm location, as well as patient age and gender. An adverse hemodynamic environment characterized by a higher maximum oscillatory shear index, higher kinetic energy and smaller low shear area as well as a more complex aneurysm shape, male gender and younger age were associated with an increased rupture risk. The corresponding AUC of the model was 0.86 (95% CI [0.85, 0.86], after correction for optimism 0.84). CONCLUSION: The model combining variables from various domains was able to discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms with an AUC of 86%. Internal validation indicated potential for the application of this model in clinical practice after evaluation with longitudinal data.
PURPOSE:Unruptured cerebral aneurysms pose a dilemma for physicians who need to weigh the risk of a devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage against the risk of surgery or endovascular treatment and their complications when deciding on a treatment strategy. A prediction model could potentially support such treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a model for aneurysm rupture based on hemodynamic and geometric parameters, aneurysm location, and patient gender and age. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 1061 patients were used for image-based computational fluid dynamics and shape characterization of 1631 aneurysms for training an aneurysm rupture probability model using logistic group Lasso regression. The model's discrimination and calibration were internally validated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration plots. RESULTS: The final model retained 11 hemodynamic and 12 morphological variables, aneurysm location, as well as patient age and gender. An adverse hemodynamic environment characterized by a higher maximum oscillatory shear index, higher kinetic energy and smaller low shear area as well as a more complex aneurysm shape, male gender and younger age were associated with an increased rupture risk. The corresponding AUC of the model was 0.86 (95% CI [0.85, 0.86], after correction for optimism 0.84). CONCLUSION: The model combining variables from various domains was able to discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms with an AUC of 86%. Internal validation indicated potential for the application of this model in clinical practice after evaluation with longitudinal data.
Authors: Felicitas J Detmer; Sara Hadad; Bong Jae Chung; Fernando Mut; Martin Slawski; Norman Juchler; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Sven Hirsch; Philippe Bijlenga; Yuya Uchiyama; Soichiro Fujimura; Makoto Yamamoto; Yuichi Murayama; Hiroyuki Takao; Timo Koivisto; Juhana Frösen; Juan R Cebral Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Sylvia Saalfeld; Samuel Voß; Oliver Beuing; Bernhard Preim; Philipp Berg Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Felicitas J Detmer; Daniel Lückehe; Fernando Mut; Martin Slawski; Sven Hirsch; Philippe Bijlenga; Gabriele von Voigt; Juan R Cebral Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Felicitas J Detmer; Bong Jae Chung; Fernando Mut; Michael Pritz; Martin Slawski; Farid Hamzei-Sichani; David Kallmes; Christopher Putman; Carlos Jimenez; Juan R Cebral Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Philipp Berg; Samuel Voß; Gábor Janiga; Sylvia Saalfeld; Aslak W Bergersen; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Jan Bruening; Leonid Goubergrits; Andreas Spuler; Tin Lok Chiu; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gabriele Copelli; Benjamin Csippa; György Paál; Gábor Závodszky; Felicitas J Detmer; Bong J Chung; Juan R Cebral; Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Christof Karmonik; Saba Elias; Nicole M Cancelliere; Mehdi Najafi; David A Steinman; Vitor M Pereira; Senol Piskin; Ender A Finol; Mariya Pravdivtseva; Prasanth Velvaluri; Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Santhosh Seshadhri; Sreenivas Venguru; Masaaki Shojima; Sergey Sindeev; Sergey Frolov; Yi Qian; Yu-An Wu; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Oliver Beuing Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Felicitas J Detmer; Daniel Fajardo-Jiménez; Fernando Mut; Norman Juchler; Sven Hirsch; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Philippe Bijlenga; Juan R Cebral Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Pablo M Munarriz; Eduardo Bárcena; Jose F Alén; Ana M Castaño-Leon; Igor Paredes; Luis Miguel Moreno-Gómez; Daniel García-Pérez; Luis Jiménez-Roldán; Pedro A Gómez; Alfonso Lagares Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 1.610