OBJECTIVE: Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and multiple intracranial aneurysms present a unique challenge to the neurosurgeon. Unless all aneurysms can be clipped through a single craniotomy, the surgeon must accurately determine which aneurysm has ruptured. Misjudgment may result in disastrous postoperative rebleeding from the untreated but true ruptured lesion. We assessed the risk of false localization of the rupture site and subsequent rebleeding and documented the problems in predicting the true rupture site when patients have multiple intracranial aneurysms. METHOD: We reviewed the records of a consecutive series of 93 patients treated over a period of 12 years who presented with their first subarachnoid hemorrhage and who had multiple intracranial aneurysms. The rupture site was determined on the basis of computed tomographic and angiographic findings, and the supposed ruptured aneurysm was clipped within 2 days of hemorrhage in each patient. Additional aneurysms that could not be accessed in the same surgical session were operated on at a later stage. All patients' records were reviewed, and all computed tomographic scans and angiograms, including repeat studies performed in some patients, were retrospectively reevaluated by the authors, who had no knowledge of the patients' clinical information. RESULTS: The location of the aneurysm that ruptured was verified at the time of surgery or during the autopsy in 76 patients (82%). The aneurysm that ruptured was the one predicted as ruptured by the surgeon before surgery in 69 patients (91%) and in retrospect in 72 patients (95%). Five of the 6 patients in whom the ruptured aneurysm was not correctly identified were thought to have only a single aneurysm. Four patients rebled after surgery, and 2 patients died as a result of the rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In the reported series, the most common cause of rebleeding soon after aneurysm surgery was failure to obliterate the ruptured aneurysm, usually because it was missed on the initial angiogram. The results support not only meticulous radiological investigation of all intracranial arteries before surgery but also thorough surgical inspection of the target aneurysm in all cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage even after one candidate lesion has been discovered.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and multiple intracranial aneurysms present a unique challenge to the neurosurgeon. Unless all aneurysms can be clipped through a single craniotomy, the surgeon must accurately determine which aneurysm has ruptured. Misjudgment may result in disastrous postoperative rebleeding from the untreated but true ruptured lesion. We assessed the risk of false localization of the rupture site and subsequent rebleeding and documented the problems in predicting the true rupture site when patients have multiple intracranial aneurysms. METHOD: We reviewed the records of a consecutive series of 93 patients treated over a period of 12 years who presented with their first subarachnoid hemorrhage and who had multiple intracranial aneurysms. The rupture site was determined on the basis of computed tomographic and angiographic findings, and the supposed ruptured aneurysm was clipped within 2 days of hemorrhage in each patient. Additional aneurysms that could not be accessed in the same surgical session were operated on at a later stage. All patients' records were reviewed, and all computed tomographic scans and angiograms, including repeat studies performed in some patients, were retrospectively reevaluated by the authors, who had no knowledge of the patients' clinical information. RESULTS: The location of the aneurysm that ruptured was verified at the time of surgery or during the autopsy in 76 patients (82%). The aneurysm that ruptured was the one predicted as ruptured by the surgeon before surgery in 69 patients (91%) and in retrospect in 72 patients (95%). Five of the 6 patients in whom the ruptured aneurysm was not correctly identified were thought to have only a single aneurysm. Four patients rebled after surgery, and 2 patients died as a result of the rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In the reported series, the most common cause of rebleeding soon after aneurysm surgery was failure to obliterate the ruptured aneurysm, usually because it was missed on the initial angiogram. The results support not only meticulous radiological investigation of all intracranial arteries before surgery but also thorough surgical inspection of the target aneurysm in all cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage even after one candidate lesion has been discovered.
Authors: H Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; J Wang; N Varble; S-I Sugiyama; A Shimizu; L Jing; J Liu; X Yang; A H Siddiqui; J M Davies; H Meng Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P J Porter; M Mazighi; G Rodesch; H Alvarez; N Aghakhani; P H David; P Lasjaunias Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2002-01-10 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Einat Slonimsky; Kent Upham; Sarah Pepley; Tao Ouyang; Tonya King; Marco Fiorelli; Krishnamoorthy Thamburaj Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2022-01-24