Literature DB >> 25550996

Can outer-to-outer diameter be used alone in diagnosing appendicitis on 128-slice MDCT?

Jamal Yaqoob1, Muhammad Idris1, Muhammad Shahbaz Alam1, Nazia Kashif1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the frequency of visualization, position and diameter of normal appendix on 128-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in adult population.
METHODS: Retrospective cross sectional study conducted at Radiology Department, Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from March 2013 to October 2013. Non-enhanced computed tomography scans of abdomen and pelvis of 98 patients presenting with hematuria (not associated with abdominal pain, fever or colonic disease) were reviewed by two radiologists, blinded to patient history. The study group included 55 females and 43 males with overall mean age of 54.7 years (range 21 to 94 years). The coronal reformatted images were reviewed in addition to the axial images. The frequency of visualization of appendix was recorded with assessment of position, diameter and luminal contents.
RESULTS: The appendix was recorded as definitely visualized in 99% of patients and mean outer-to-outer diameter of the appendix was 5.6 ± 1.3 mm (range 3.0-11.0 mm).
CONCLUSION: MDCT with its multiplanar reformation display is extremely useful for visualization of normal appendix. The normal appendix is very variable in its position and diameter. In the absence of other signs, the diagnosis of acute appendix should not be made solely on outer-to-outer appendiceal diameter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendiceal enlargement; Computed tomography; Multidetector computed tomography; Normal appendix

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550996      PMCID: PMC4278152          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i12.913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  24 in total

1.  Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix.

Authors:  V Simonovský
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Identification of the normal appendix in healthy adults by 64-slice MDCT: the value of adding coronal reformation images.

Authors:  H C Kim; D M Yang; W Jin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Erik K Paulson; John P Harris; Tracy A Jaffe; Paul A Haugan; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.

Authors:  Caroline P Daly; Richard H Cohan; Isaac R Francis; Elaine M Caoili; James H Ellis; Bin Nan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.

Authors:  J E Jacobs; B A Birnbaum; M Macari; A J Megibow; G Israel; D D Maki; A M Aguiar; C P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; J N Lawrason; C J McCabe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Appendicitis near its centenary.

Authors:  J Berry; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  G Ege; H Akman; A Sahin; D Bugra; K Kuzucu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Ives; Susan Sung; Peter McCue; Haroon Durrani; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.

Authors:  D Choi; H Park; Y R Lee; S-H Kook; S K Kim; H J Kwag; E C Chung
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.