Literature DB >> 12200239

Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

G Ege1, H Akman, A Sahin, D Bugra, K Kuzucu.   

Abstract

Clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is usually made on the basis of history, physical examination and laboratory studies. Approximately 30-45% of patients with suspected appendicitis present with atypical clinical and laboratory findings. Recently graded compression ultrasound and thin section unenhanced helical CT have been used to establish diagnosis for patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of thin section unenhanced helical CT protocol in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. CT scans obtained when patients presented with right lower quadrant pain and the clinical impression was equivocal for appendicitis were evaluated. Of 296 patients referred for CT, 123 patients subsequently underwent surgery. Appendicitis had been correctly predicted in 104 of 108 patients surgically proven to have appendicitis. Unenhanced helical CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 97% and negative predictive value of 98%. If no definite inflammatory changes are detected, on the basis of our experience we recommend that the patient be monitored clinically, and that thin section unenhanced helical CT is the optimal technique to detect acute appendicitis in adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200239     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.75.897.750721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Noncontrast and contrast enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: A retrospective study for the usefulness.

Authors:  Maki Kitagawa; Tatsuya Kotani; Yuji Miyamoto; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hideaki Tsurudome; Hiroshi Nishi; Masaharu Yabe; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2009-06-01

2.  Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings.

Authors:  Stefania Tamburrini; Arturo Brunetti; Michèle Brown; Claude Sirlin; Giovanna Casola
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Can outer-to-outer diameter be used alone in diagnosing appendicitis on 128-slice MDCT?

Authors:  Jamal Yaqoob; Muhammad Idris; Muhammad Shahbaz Alam; Nazia Kashif
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-28

4.  Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Lahaye; D M J Lambregts; E Mutsaers; B A B Essers; S Breukink; V C Cappendijk; G L Beets; R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults.

Authors:  Stefania Tamburrini; Arturo Brunetti; Michèle Brown; Claude B Sirlin; Giovanna Casola
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

7.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19

8.  Missed appendicitis diagnosis: A case report.

Authors:  Jocelyn Cox; Guy Sovak
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

9.  Does limiting oral contrast decrease emergency department length of stay?

Authors:  Christy L Hopkins; Troy Madsen; Zachary Foy; Michielle Reina; Erik Barton
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11

10.  The normal appendix on CT: does size matter?

Authors:  Inneke Willekens; Els Peeters; Michel De Maeseneer; Johan de Mey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.