Literature DB >> 25550223

Analysis of an online match discussion board: improving the otolaryngology-head and neck surgery match.

Elliott D Kozin1, Rosh K V Sethi1, Ashton Lehmann1, Aaron K Remenschneider1, Justin S Golub2, Samuel A Reyes3, Kevin S Emerick1, Daniel J Lee1, Stacey T Gray4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: "The Match" has become the accepted selection process for graduate medical education. Otomatch.com has provided an online forum for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) Match-related questions for over a decade. Herein, we aim to delineate the type of posts on Otomatch to better understand the perspective of medical students applying for OHNS residency. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of an OHNS Match-related online forum. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were contributors to an OHNS Match-related online forum. Posts on Otomatch between December 2001 and April 2014 were reviewed. The title of each thread and number of views were recorded for quantitative analysis. Each thread was organized into 1 of 6 major categories and 1 of 18 subcategories. National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data were utilized for comparison.
RESULTS: We identified 1921 threads corresponding to over 2 million page views. Over 40% of threads were related to questions about specific programs, and 27% were discussions about interviews. Views, a surrogate measure for popularity, reflected different trends. The majority of individuals viewed posts on interviews (42%), program-specific questions (20%), and how to rank programs (11%). There was an increase in viewership tracked with a rise in applicant numbers based on NRMP data.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides an in-depth analysis of a popular discussion forum for medical students interested in the OHNS Match process. The most viewed posts are about interview dates and questions regarding specific programs. We provide suggestions to address unmet needs for medical students and potentially improve the Match process. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Match; education; otolaryngology; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550223      PMCID: PMC4465530          DOI: 10.1177/0194599814561187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  14 in total

1.  The origins, history, and design of the resident match.

Authors:  Alvin E Roth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey.

Authors:  Christopher D Lansford; Samuel R Fisher; Robert H Ossoff; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-09

3.  The use of Part I National Board scores in the selection of residents in ophthalmology and otolaryngology.

Authors:  R J McCollister
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Too much of a good thing.

Authors:  J Jared Christophel; Paul A Levine
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  The matching program from a student's viewpoint. How to win at residency roulette.

Authors:  N E Mason
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11

6.  Current methods of evaluating a resident's performance.

Authors:  L Harker
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11

7.  The residency matching program.

Authors:  J S Graettinger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11

8.  The matching program as it applies to general surgery and specialties from a general surgeon's viewpoint.

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11

9.  Resolved: all otolaryngology programs should participate in the residency matching program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11

10.  Evaluation and nonreappointment of residents. Panel discussion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  On Blast: A Framework for Monitoring and Responding to Online Comments About Your Graduate Medical Education Program.

Authors:  Ryan J J Buckley; Charles Brown; Samantha Stringer; Tatiana Moylan; Robert Huang; Mary Haas
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-18

2.  Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.

Authors:  Matthew Ward; Christian Pingree; Adrienne M Laury; Sarah N Bowe
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Information scarcity among otolaryngology applicants: A review of the largest database of programs.

Authors:  Prithwijit Roychowdhury; Matthew James Wu; Elliott Davin Kozin; Aaron Kyle Remenschneider; Stacey Tutt Gray
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 4.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.