Literature DB >> 12588278

The origins, history, and design of the resident match.

Alvin E Roth1.   

Abstract

In the early 1900s, competition among hospitals for interns and among medical students for good internships led to increasingly early offers of internships to students. By the 1940s, appointments were often made as early as the beginning of the junior year of medical school. Hospitals thus had little information about students' performance, and students frequently had to make a final decision to accept or reject an offer without knowing which other offers might be forthcoming. From 1945 through 1951, efforts were made to enforce a uniform date for accepting offers. However, students were still faced with offers having very short deadlines, compelling them to accept or reject offers without knowing what other offers might be forthcoming. Hospitals often had to scramble for available students, since if an offer was rejected, it was often too late for them to reach their next preferred candidate. A centralized clearinghouse was thus developed as a way of alleviating this chaos and allowing a larger role to the preferences of both students and hospitals. This evolved into the current matching program, whose algorithm continues to be updated to take account of changing needs of applicants, such as growth in the number of couples who seek 2 positions in the same vicinity.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588278     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.7.909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of the neuroradiology fellowship match: year 3.

Authors:  David M Yousem; Dima A Hammoud
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Out-of-Match Residency Offers: The Possible Extent and Implications of Prematching in Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Robert V Wetz; Charles B Seelig; Georges Khoueiry; Kera F Weiserbs
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

3.  A Challenge to Disrupt the Disruptive Process of Residency Interview Invitations.

Authors:  Matthew R Klein; Sandra M Sanguino; David H Salzman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

4.  Residency Placement Fever: Is It Time for a Reevaluation?

Authors:  Philip A Gruppuso; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Surgery-passion, proficiency, perfection and profession.

Authors:  Satish Shukla; Chiranjiva Khandelwal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Residency Postinterview Communications: More Harm Than Good?

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Carolyn S Avery; Charles M Maxfield
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-02

7.  Not the Last Word: Want to Match in an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency? Send a Rose to the Program Director.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Reforming the Match: A Proposal for a New 3-Phase System.

Authors:  Joseph G Monir
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-02

9.  Analysis of an online match discussion board: improving the otolaryngology-head and neck surgery match.

Authors:  Elliott D Kozin; Rosh K V Sethi; Ashton Lehmann; Aaron K Remenschneider; Justin S Golub; Samuel A Reyes; Kevin S Emerick; Daniel J Lee; Stacey T Gray
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.

Authors:  Rebecca S Harvey; Kevin J Kovatch; Mark E P Prince; Kelly M Malloy; Marc C Thorne
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.