Literature DB >> 25549690

Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.

Annette Schumann1, Maja Serman, Olaf Gefeller, Ulrich Hoppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Specific computer-based auditory training may be a useful completion in the rehabilitation process for cochlear implant (CI) listeners to achieve sufficient speech intelligibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a computerized, phoneme-discrimination training programme.
DESIGN: The study employed a pretest-post-test design; participants were randomly assigned to the training or control group. Over a period of three weeks, the training group was instructed to train in phoneme discrimination via computer, twice a week. Sentence recognition in different noise conditions (moderate to difficult) was tested pre- and post-training, and six months after the training was completed. The control group was tested and retested within one month. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-seven adult CI listeners who had been using cochlear implants for more than two years participated in the programme; 15 adults in the training group, 12 adults in the control group.
RESULTS: Besides significant improvements for the trained phoneme-identification task, a generalized training effect was noted via significantly improved sentence recognition in moderate noise. No significant changes were noted in the difficult noise conditions. Improved performance was maintained over an extended period.
CONCLUSIONS: Phoneme-discrimination training improves experienced CI listeners' speech perception in noise. Additional research is needed to optimize auditory training for individual benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult cochlear implant listeners; auditory training; phoneme discrimination and identification; sentence recognition in noise; speech audiometry

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25549690     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.969409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].

Authors:  A Müller; T Hocke; U Hoppe; P Mir-Salim
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Auditory group therapy in adult cochlear implant rehabilitation].

Authors:  C Glaubitz; E K Lehmann; L Weber; A-M Kulke; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Phoneme discrimination training with experienced cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  A Schumann; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.

Authors:  Melanie Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

5.  Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Priyanka Reddy; Cheng Ma; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Effect of Serious Gaming on Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility in Adult Cochlear Implantees: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Pierre Reynard; Virginie Attina; Samar Idriss; Ruben Hermann; Claire Barilly; Evelyne Veuillet; Charles-Alexandre Joly; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Computer-Based Connected-Text Training of Speech-in-Noise Perception for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Depressive symptoms affect short- and long-term speech recognition outcome in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Katharina Heinze-Köhler; Effi Katharina Lehmann; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.