Literature DB >> 25548128

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures provides better results than in revision procedures for fracture sequelae.

Nikola Cicak, Cicak Nikola1, Hrvoje Klobucar, Klobucar Hrvoje, Nenad Medancic, Medancic Nenad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with acute fracture and sequelae of the proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were treated with RSA for acute fracture and sequelae of a proximal humeral fracture. The average age was 73 years (range 50-87 years). Twenty-one patients had had no previous surgery, seven patients had acute fractures and 14 patients had chronic fractures. Sixteen patients had had previous surgery. Active range of motion and Constant score were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of two years.
RESULTS: Active elevation was 102°, external rotation 24°, and internal rotation was up to L4 in all patients. In the group of patients without previous surgery treated with RSA, elevation was 116°, external rotation 24°, and internal rotation up to L3. In the group of patients with previous surgery treated with RSA, elevation was 84°, external rotation 19°, and internal rotation up to L4. In the group of patients with acute fracture treated with RSA, elevation was 124°, external rotation 28°, and internal rotation up to L4. In the group of patients with chronic or sequel of the fractures treated with RSA elevation was 114° , external rotation 28°, and internal rotation up to L3. Constant score in all patients was 54. Constant score in patients without previous surgery treated with RSA was 68 and with previous surgery it was 42.
CONCLUSION: Patients without previous surgery treated with RSA for fractures had better functional results than patients who had undergone previous surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25548128     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2649-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

Review 1.  Proximal humerus malunions.

Authors:  J A Siegel; D M Dines
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 2.  Posterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Authors:  N Cicak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

3.  Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Christopher Chuinard; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Gilles Walch; Christophe Trojani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Management of malunion of the proximal humerus: current concepts.

Authors:  Daphne Pinkas; Tony S Wanich; Anthony A DePalma; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  C M L Werner; P A Steinmann; M Gilbart; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Derek J Cuff; Derek R Pupello
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Technical pitfalls of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture management.

Authors:  Brent B Wiesel; Sameer Nagda; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Arthroscopic treatment for greater tuberosity fractures: rationale and surgical technique.

Authors:  Ettore Taverna; Valerio Sansone; Ferdinando Battistella
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Malunion of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  F Duparc
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Operative treatment of malunion of a fracture of the proximal aspect of the humerus.

Authors:  P K Beredjiklian; J P Iannotti; T R Norris; G R Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Posttraumatic arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint. From partial resurfacing to reverse shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  N Matis; R Ortmaier; P Moroder; H Resch; A Auffarth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Early Versus Late Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Adam Seidl; Daniel Sholder; William Warrender; Michael Livesey; Gerald Williams; Joseph Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yanbin Zhu; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen; Ye Tian; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures in the geriatric patient: results, health-related quality of life and complication rates.

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Javier García-Coiradas; Laura Serrano-Mateo; Carlos García-Fernández; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick A Nelson; Changyow C Kwan; Vehniah K Tjong; Michael A Terry; Ujash Sheth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2020-09-15

6.  Clinical outcomes of cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Kao; Omar A Protzuk; Robert S O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-10-02

7.  Effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary and secondary fracture care: mid-term outcomes in a single-centre experience.

Authors:  A M Schwarz; G M Hohenberger; M Sauerschnig; M Niks; G Lipnik; G Mattiassich; M Zacherl; F J Seibert; M Plecko
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

9.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.