| Literature DB >> 25544899 |
Metin Uzun1, Adnan Kara2, Müjdat Adaş3, Bülent Karslioğlu4, Murat Bülbül5, Burak Beksaç6.
Abstract
Purpose. We evaluated whether intramedullary nail fixation for tibial diaphysis fractures with concomitant fibula fractures (except at the distal one-third level) managed conservatively with an associated fibula fracture resulted in ankle deformity and assessed the impact of the ankle deformity on lower extremity function. Methods. Sixty middle one-third tibial shaft fractures with associated fibular fractures, except the distal one-third level, were included in this study. All tibial shaft fractures were anatomically reduced and fixed with interlocking intramedullary nails. Fibular fractures were managed conservatively. Hindfoot alignment was assessed clinically. Tibia and fibular lengths were compared to contralateral measurements using radiographs. Functional results were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index Score (FADI). Results. Anatomic union, defined as equal length in operative and contralateral tibias, was achieved in 60 fractures (100%). Fibular shortening was identified in 42 fractures (68%). Mean fibular shortening was 1.2 cm (range, 0.5-2 cm). Clinical exams showed increased hindfoot valgus in 42 fractures (68%). The mean KOOS was 88.4, and the mean FADI score was 90. Conclusion. Fibular fractures in the middle or proximal one-third may need to be stabilized at the time of tibial intramedullary nail fixation to prevent development of hindfoot valgus due to fibular shortening.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25544899 PMCID: PMC4273594 DOI: 10.1155/2014/806363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Orthop ISSN: 2090-3464
Figure 1Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images showing a middle one-third tibial shaft fracture with an associated fibular fracture and a healed tibial fracture treated with intramedullary nailing.
Figure 2Stance position. Solid lines were marked on the skin, and dashed lines have been added to the photograph to identify the tibial angle and the calcaneal stance.
Figure 3Clinical images showing the crus heel relationship.
Figure 4Clinical images showing differences in opposite extremities due to weight-bearing.