Literature DB >> 8580949

Alignment and joint motion in the normal foot.

M Aström1, T Arvidson.   

Abstract

Biomechanical evaluation of the foot is based on the assumption that a vertical stance position of the calf and the calcaneus in subtalar neutral (the "ideal foot") provides optimal function with minimal risk of injury. The purpose of this study was to discuss the concept of the "ideal foot" with reference to a set of normative goniometric data. One-hundred and twenty-one healthy subjects (59 men and 62 women; mean age = 35 years; range = 20-50 years) participated in a standardized clinical assessment of ankle and subtalar joint motion, subtalar neutral, forefoot alignment, calcaneal stance, and the tibia to vertical angle. All subtalar measurements were referred to the neutral position. A majority had a subtalar neutral in slight valgus (overall mean = 2 degrees), a forefoot in moderate varus (overall mean = 6 degrees), and a calcaneal stance in valgus (overall mean = 7 degrees). The mean tibia to vertical angle was 6 degrees in varus. Women had a greater range of ankle and subtalar joint motion than men but age had little influence. None of the subjects conformed to the "ideal foot," which appears to be rare and should be abandoned in favor of a reference based on clinical observation rather than on theoretical considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580949     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.5.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  17 in total

1.  Relation between running injury and static lower limb alignment in recreational runners.

Authors:  V Lun; W H Meeuwisse; P Stergiou; D Stefanyshyn
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Anatomical and structural factors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  ACL Research Retreat VI: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Ajit M Chaudhari; Malcolm Collins; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  An evaluation of the rearfoot posture in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Wendy Gilleard
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot.

Authors:  Mette Kjærgaard Nilsson; Rikke Friis; Maria Skjoldahl Michaelsen; Patrick Abildgaard Jakobsen; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Reliability of plantar pressure platforms.

Authors:  Jocelyn F Hafer; Mark W Lenhoff; Jinsup Song; Joanne M Jordan; Marian T Hannan; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Subtalar joint position during gastrocnemius stretching and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.

Authors:  Marie Johanson; Jennifer Baer; Holley Hovermale; Phouvy Phouthavong
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.