PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe community-based participatory processes used to develop promotore training on cancer research, and to assess the feasibility of training promotores from rural communities to disseminate cancer research information. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort design. SETTING: Rural communities in the state of Kansas. SAMPLE: 34 Spanish-speaking promotores attended an information session; 27 enrolled and 22 completed training. METHODS: With input from a community advisory board, the authors developed a leadership and cancer curriculum and trained Spanish-speaking promotores to disseminate information on cancer research. Promotores completed pretraining and post-training surveys in Spanish to assess demographic characteristics and changes in knowledge of cancer, cancer treatment and cancer research studies, and intent to participate in cancer research. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Cancer knowledge, awareness of cancer clinical trials, interest in participating in cancer clinical research studies. FINDINGS: Compared to pretraining, after training, promotores were more likely to correctly define cancer, identify biopsies, describe cancer stages, and report ever having heard of cancer research studies. CONCLUSIONS: Completion rates of the training and willingness to participate in cancer research were high, supporting the feasibility of training promotores to deliver community-based education to promote cancer research participation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nursing professionals and researchers can collaborate with promotores to disseminate cancer education and research among underserved rural Latino communities in Kansas and elsewhere. Members of these communities appear willing and interested in improving their knowledge of cancer and cancer clinical trials.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe community-based participatory processes used to develop promotore training on cancer research, and to assess the feasibility of training promotores from rural communities to disseminate cancer research information. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort design. SETTING: Rural communities in the state of Kansas. SAMPLE: 34 Spanish-speaking promotores attended an information session; 27 enrolled and 22 completed training. METHODS: With input from a community advisory board, the authors developed a leadership and cancer curriculum and trained Spanish-speaking promotores to disseminate information on cancer research. Promotores completed pretraining and post-training surveys in Spanish to assess demographic characteristics and changes in knowledge of cancer, cancer treatment and cancer research studies, and intent to participate in cancer research. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Cancer knowledge, awareness of cancer clinical trials, interest in participating in cancer clinical research studies. FINDINGS: Compared to pretraining, after training, promotores were more likely to correctly define cancer, identify biopsies, describe cancer stages, and report ever having heard of cancer research studies. CONCLUSIONS: Completion rates of the training and willingness to participate in cancer research were high, supporting the feasibility of training promotores to deliver community-based education to promote cancer research participation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nursing professionals and researchers can collaborate with promotores to disseminate cancer education and research among underserved rural Latino communities in Kansas and elsewhere. Members of these communities appear willing and interested in improving their knowledge of cancer and cancer clinical trials.
Entities:
Keywords:
Latinos; cancer research; community-based participatory research; immigrants; lay health workers; promotores de salud
Authors: Christine Barthow; Bernadette Jones; Lindsay Macdonald; Sue Vernall; Peter Gallagher; Eileen McKinlay Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Kristen J Wells; John S Luque; Branko Miladinovic; Natalia Vargas; Yasmin Asvat; Richard G Roetzheim; Ambuj Kumar Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Linda K Larkey; Patricia M Herman; Denise J Roe; Francisco Garcia; A M Lopez; J Gonzalez; Prasadini N Perera; Kathylynn Saboda Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Warren B Sateren; Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey Abrams; Otis Brawley; Nancy Breen; Leslie Ford; Mary McCabe; Richard Kaplan; Malcolm Smith; Richard Ungerleider; Michaele C Christian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Benjamin J Oldfield; Marcus A Harrison; Inginia Genao; Ann T Greene; Mary Ellen Pappas; Janis G Glover; Marjorie S Rosenthal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kim L Larson; Holly F Mathews; Janet P Moye; Marianne R Congema; Sarah J Hoffman; Karla M Murrieta; Lee Ann Johnson Journal: Glob Qual Nurs Res Date: 2021-03-23