| Literature DB >> 25542038 |
Aiko Sueta1, Yutaka Yamamoto1, Mutsuko Yamamoto-Ibusuki2, Mitsuhiro Hayashi2, Takashi Takeshita2, Satoko Yamamoto2, Hirotaka Iwase2.
Abstract
The phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is commonly deregulated in breast cancer through several mechanisms, including PIK3CA mutation and loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase-II (INPP4B). We aimed to evaluate the predictive relevance of these biomarkers to trastuzumab efficacy in HER2-positive disease. We evaluated the effect of trastuzumab in 43 breast cancer patients with HER2-overexpression who received neoadjuvant treatment. PIK3CA mutation was examined by direct sequencing and digital PCR assay, and PIK3CA copy number was assessed by digital PCR assay of pretreatment tissues. PTEN, pAkt, and INPP4B were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Direct sequencing detected mutant DNA in 21% of all patients, but the incidence increased to 49% using digital PCR. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in patients with PIK3CA mutations was 29% compared with 67% for those without PIK3CA mutations (P = 0.093), when the mutation was defined as positive if the mutant proportion was more than 10% of total genetic content by digital PCR. Low PTEN expression was associated with less pCR compared to high expression (33% versus 72%, P = 0.034). There were no significant associations of PIK3CA copy number, pAKt, or INPP4B with trastuzumab efficacy. In multivariate analysis, activation of the PI3K pathway due to either PIK3CA mutation or low PTEN were related to poorer response to trastuzumab (OR of predictive pCR was 0.11, 95%CI; 0.03-0.48). In conclusion, activating the PI3K pathway is associated with low pCR to trastuzumab-based treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer. Combined analysis of PIK3CA mutation and PTEN expression may serve as critical indicators to identify patients unlikely to respond to trastuzumab.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25542038 PMCID: PMC4277449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Detection of PIK3CA mutation (E542K, E545K, H1047R) by DNA sequencing and digital PCR analysis (only among the patients whose mutations were detected).
| Patient ID | Mutation | |
| Direct sequencing Digital PCR analysis (mutant percentage) | ||
| 31 | H1047R, E542K | H1047R (58.2%), E542K (41.0%) |
| 10 | H1047R | H1047R (28.9%) |
| 40 | H1047R | H1047R (25.8%), E542K (0.3%), E545K (0.2%) |
| 18 | H1047R | H1047R (19.2%) |
| 37 | H1047R | H1047R (16.7%), E542K (0.1%) |
| 15 | H1047R | H1047R (6.8%) |
| 41 | H1047R | E542K (0.2%) |
| 27 | E542K | E542K (24.6%) |
| 8 | E545K | E545K (20.9%) |
| 23 | Wild-type | H1047R (7.7%) |
| 34 | Wild-type | H1047R (5.1%), E545K (0.9%) |
| 3 | Wild-type | H1047R (1.5%) |
| 16 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.8%) |
| 36 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.7%) |
| 1 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.6%) |
| 7 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.6%) |
| 12 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.5%), E545K (0.3%) |
| 26 | Wild-type | H1047R (0.4%), E542K (0.1%) |
| 13 | Wild-type | E542K (0.4%) |
| 39 | Wild-type | E545K (0.3%) |
| 28 | Wild-type | E542K (0.1%), E545K (0.1%) |
| Frequency | 21% | 49% |
Frequency of the patient with mutated DNA.
Figure 1Representative image of PIK3CA exon 20 (A, B) and exon 9 mutations (C) using direct sequencing and digital PCR.
For the digital PCR assay, signals from wild-type-specific probe are detected as blue, and signals from mutant-type are detected as red. A; mutation is detectable by direct sequencing and harbors more than 50% of mutant DNA using digital PCR. B, C; detection of mutation is difficult by direct sequencing alone, harbors around 20% of mutant DNA by digital PCR.
Figure 2Correlation of proportion of PIK3CA mutation (defined by digital PCR) with the pCR rate.
Mut; mutation, WT; wild type.
Patients characteristics and treatment response by PIK3CA mutation, copy number variation, PTEN, pAkt, and INPP4B expression.
| All patients |
|
| PTEN | pAkt | INPP4B | |||||||||||
| WT | Mutation |
| Normal/loss | Gain |
| Low | High |
| Low | High |
| Low | High |
| ||
| N | 42 | 36 | 7 | 37 | 6 | 12 | 29 | 10 | 30 | 7 | 32 | |||||
| Mean age | 53.0 | 53.1 | 52.6 | 0.974 | 53.6 | 49.8 | 0.352 | 51.8 | 53.2 | 0.456 | 54.9 | 52.4 | 0.650 | 53.6 | 53.0 | 0.927 |
| Mean tumor size (mm) | 34 | 34 | 32 | 0.843 | 34 | 30 | 0.344 | 29 | 35 | 0.295 | 32 | 35 | 0.839 | 50 | 30 | 0.035 |
| Nodal status | ||||||||||||||||
| negative | 21 (49%) | 19 (53%) | 2 (29%) | 18 (49%) | 3 (50%) | 6 (50%) | 14 (48%) | 5 (50%) | 15 (50%) | 3 (43%) | 16 (50%) | |||||
| positive | 22 (51%) | 17 (47%) | 5 (71%) | 0.412 | 18 (51%) | 3 (50%) | 0.645 | 6 (50%) | 15 (52%) | 1.00 | 5 (50%) | 15 (50%) | 1.00 | 4 (57%) | 16 (50%) | 1.00 |
| Nuclear grade | ||||||||||||||||
| 1–2 | 24 (57%) | 21 (60%) | 3 (43%) | 22 (59%) | 2 (40%) | 7 (58%) | 15 (54%) | 6 (67%) | 16 (53%) | 1 (14%) | 20 (65%) | |||||
| 3 | 3 (18%) | 14 (40%) | 4 (57%) | 0.438 | 15 (41%) | 3 (60%) | 0.636 | 5 (42%) | 13 (46%) | 1.00 | 3 (33%) | 14 (47%) | 0.704 | 6 (86%) | 11 (35%) | 0.031 |
| ER | ||||||||||||||||
| negative | 23 (53%) | 20 (56%) | 3 (43%) | 19 (51%) | 4 (67%) | 6 (59%) | 16 (55%) | 8 (80%) | 14 (47%) | 3 (43%) | 18 (56%) | |||||
| positive | 20 (47%) | 16 (44%) | 4 (57%) | 0.687 | 18 (49%) | 2 (33%) | 0.669 | 6 (50%) | 13 (45%) | 1.00 | 2 (20%) | 16 (53%) | 0.069 | 4 (57%) | 14 (44%) | 0.682 |
| PR | ||||||||||||||||
| negative | 32 (74%) | 29 (81%) | 4 (57%) | 28 (76%) | 5 (83%) | 8 (67%) | 23 (79%) | 10 (100%) | 21 (70%) | 4 (57%) | 25 (78%) | |||||
| positive | 11 (26%) | 7 (19%) | 3 (43%) | 0.325 | 9 (24%) | 1 (17%) | 1.00 | 4 (33%) | 6 (21%) | 0.441 | 0 (0%) | 9 (30%) | 0.081 | 3 (43%) | 7 (22%) | 0.344 |
| Mean ki67 | 44.7 | 43 | 53 | 0.364 | 45 | 44 | 0.195 | 50 | 39 | 0.839 | 42 | 37 | 42 | 41 | 0.473 | |
| Tumor subtype | ||||||||||||||||
| luminal/HER2 | 19 (44%) | 15 (79%) | 4 (21%) | 20 (54%) | 4 (67%) | 6 (50%) | 17 (59%) | 8 (80%) | 15 (50%) | 3 (43%) | 19 (59%) | |||||
| HER2 | 24 (56%) | 21 (88%) | 3 (13%) | 0.68 | 17 (46%) | 2 (33%) | 0.678 | 6 (50%) | 12 (41%) | 0.734 | 2 (20%) | 15 (50%) | 0.145 | 4 (57%) | 13 (41%) | 0.677 |
| Treatment response | ||||||||||||||||
| pCR | 26 (60%) | 24 (67%) | 2 (29%) | 22 (59%) | 4 (67%) | 4 (33%) | 21 (72%) | 7 (70%) | 17 (57%) | 3 (43%) | 21 (66%) | |||||
| non-pCR | 17 (40%) | 12 (33%) | 5 (71%) | 0.093 | 15 (41%) | 2 (33%) | 1.00 | 8 (67%) | 8 (28%) | 0.034 | 3 (30%) | 13 (43%) | 0.711 | 4 (57%) | 11 (34%) | 0.396 |
WT; wild type, ER; estrogen receptor, PR; progesteron receptor, HER2; human epidermal growth factor 2, PTEN; phosphatase and tensin homolog, INPP4B; inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase-II,
Mutation was defind as positive if the proportion of mutant DNA was more than 10% by digital PCR analysis.
copy number gain was defiend if the copy number of PIK3CA was greater than 1.5 compared to RNaseP.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining patterns of PTEN, pAkt, and INPP4B. pAkt expression; A, negative staining (HS<12.5), B, positive (HS≥12.5), PTEN expression; C, negative staining (HS<60), D, positive (HS≥60), INPP4B expression; E, negative staining (HS<60), F, positive (HS≥60) (Magnification ×400).
Logistic regression analyses for predictive pCR.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age (year) | ||||
| ≥50 versus <50 | 2.13 (0.61–7.41) | 0.237 | ||
| Tumor size (mm) | ||||
| ≥30 versus <30 | 0.76 (0.22–2.59) | 0.664 | ||
| Nodal status | ||||
| positive versus negative | 1.31 (0.39–4.47) | 0.664 | ||
| ER status | ||||
| positive versus negative | 0.19 (0.05–0.70) | 0.013 | 0.14 (0.02–0.78) | 0.025 |
| PR status | ||||
| positive versus negative | 0.09 (0.02–0.53) | 0.007 | ||
| Ki67 labeling index (%) | ||||
| ≥30 versus <30 | 1.75 (0.42–7.30) | 0.442 | ||
| Nuclear grade | ||||
| 3 versus 1, 2 | 1.12 (0.32–3.91) | 0.856 | ||
| Tumor subtype | ||||
| luminal/HER2 versus HER2 | 0.39 (0.20–0.77) | 0.007 | ||
|
| ||||
| mutation versus wild type | 0.20 (0.03–1.19) | 0.076 | ||
| PTEN expression | ||||
| high versus low | 5.25 (1.23–22.4) | 0.025 | 0.62 (0.04–9.94) | 0.734 |
| INPP4B | ||||
| high versus low | 2.55 (0.48–13.5) | 0.271 | ||
| pAkt expression | ||||
| high versus low | 0.56 (0.12–2.60) | 0.459 | ||
|
| ||||
| gain versus normal/loss | 1.36 (0.22–8.41) | 0.738 | ||
| PI3K pathway activation | ||||
|
| 0.11 (0.03–0.48) | 0.003 | 0.05 (0.003–0.89) | 0.041d |
|
| 0.32 (0.07–1.41) | 0.134 | ||
|
| 0.15 (0.04–0.63) | 0.01 | 0.14 (0.02–1.12) | 0.064e |
OR; odds ratio, CI; confidence interval, ER; estrogen receptor, PR; progesteron receptor, HER2; human epidermal growth factor 2, PTEN; phosphatase and tensin homolog, INPP4B; inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase-II.
high defined as PIK3CA mutation and/or PTEN low.
high defined as PTEN low and/or INPP4B low.
high defined as PIK3CA mutation and/or PTEN low and/or INPP4B low.
The value was indicated when each variable was included in the model, together with ER status and PTEN expression.