Literature DB >> 17391073

Analytical validation of genotyping assays in the biomarker laboratory.

Jennifer A Isler1, Ole E Vesterqvist, Michael E Burczynski.   

Abstract

High-throughput, whole-genome association studies conducted in various diseases and therapeutic settings are identifying an increasing number of single nucleotide polymorphisms that may predict patient responses and ultimately guide therapeutic decision-making. In order to confirm the candidate genetic markers emerging from these studies, there is a commensurate need for pharmacogenomic laboratories to design and analytically validate targeted genotyping assays capable of rapidly querying the identified individual single nucleotide polymorphisms of interest in large confirmatory clinical studies. In recent years, a number of increasingly complex technologies have been applied to the qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of polymorphisms and mutations in DNA. The different approaches available for targeted DNA sequence analysis are characterized by various pros and cons that often present technology-specific challenges to the analytical validation of these assays prior to their use in clinical studies. Several key principles in the analytical validation of genotyping assays--including assay specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility and accuracy--are covered in this review article, with specific attention paid to three major end point detection technologies currently employed in targeted genotyping analysis: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Pyrosequencing and Taqman-based allelic discrimination. Thorough assessment of the performance of genotyping assays during analytical validation, and careful use of quality controls during sample analysis, will help strengthen the quality of pharmacogenomic data used to ultimately confirm the validity of exploratory biomarkers in DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17391073     DOI: 10.2217/14622416.8.4.353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  11 in total

1.  Potentials and limitations of molecular diagnostic methods in food safety.

Authors:  Andrea Lauri; Paola O Mariani
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Transcriptomic analysis of the housefly (Musca domestica) larva using massively parallel pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Fengsong Liu; Ting Tang; Lingling Sun; T A Jose Priya
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Pyrosequence analysis of expressed sequence tags for Manduca sexta hemolymph proteins involved in immune responses.

Authors:  Zhen Zou; Fares Najar; Yang Wang; Bruce Roe; Haobo Jiang
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 4.714

4.  Development of a TaqMan Allelic Discrimination assay for detection of single nucleotides polymorphisms associated with anti-malarial drug resistance.

Authors:  Edwin Kamau; Saba Alemayehu; Karla C Feghali; LaDonna S Tolbert; Bernard Ogutu; Christian F Ockenhouse
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Next generation DNA sequencing and the future of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Matthew W Anderson; Iris Schrijver
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  An integrative analysis of PIK3CA mutation, PTEN, and INPP4B expression in terms of trastuzumab efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Aiko Sueta; Yutaka Yamamoto; Mutsuko Yamamoto-Ibusuki; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Takashi Takeshita; Satoko Yamamoto; Hirotaka Iwase
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1 Mutation: Clinical Management Considerations From the Molecular and Precision Medicine (MAP) Tumor Board at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; John A Iafrate; Tilak Sundaresan; Jerry Younger; Valentina Nardi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-22

8.  Evaluation of droplet digital PCR and next generation sequencing for characterizing DNA reference material for KRAS mutation detection.

Authors:  Lianhua Dong; Shangjun Wang; Boqiang Fu; Jing Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments.

Authors:  Fatiha H Shabaruddin; Nigel D Fleeman; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2015-06-24

10.  SEOM clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer 2015.

Authors:  E Aranda; J Aparicio; V Alonso; X Garcia-Albeniz; P Garcia-Alfonso; R Salazar; M Valladares; R Vera; J M Vieitez; R Garcia-Carbonero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.