Literature DB >> 25540087

Complete resection of colorectal adenomas: what are the important factors in fellow training?

Ji Min Choi1, Changhyun Lee, Jeong Hwan Park, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Sung Wook Hwang, Jaeyoung Chun, Seong-Joon Koh, Jong Pil Im, Ji Won Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complete removal of adenomatous polyps is important for reducing interval cancer after colonoscopy. AIMS: To identify factors affecting the completeness of colonoscopic polypectomies and to evaluate the experience level of fellows who achieve competence compared with that of experts.
METHODS: Medical records of 1,860 patients who underwent at least one polypectomy for an adenomatous polyp at Seoul National University Hospital between March 2011 and February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 3,469 adenomatous polyps were included. The lateral and deep margins of the resected polyps were evaluated to check the resection completeness.
RESULTS: Of the 3,469 adenomatous polyps, 1,389 (40.0 %) were removed by two experts and 2,080 (60.0 %) were removed by seven fellows. In the expert-treated group, larger size [odds ratio (OR) 2.81 for ≥20 mm, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.64-4.84, P < 0.001] and right-sided location (OR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.05-1.63, P = 0.019) were associated with incomplete resection. In the fellow-treated group, not only polyp characteristics [right-sided location (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.18-1.69, P < 0.001)], but also the cumulative number of procedures was also related to resection completeness. After 300 polypectomies, the complete resection rate of the fellows was comparable to that of the experts.
CONCLUSIONS: In the fellow-treated group, the level of procedure experience was closely associated with the polypectomy outcomes. Meticulous attention is critical to ensure the completeness of polypectomies performed by trainee endoscopists during the training program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540087     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3500-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  29 in total

1.  Clinical features and prognosis of early colorectal cancer treated by endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Mi Na Kim; Jung Mook Kang; Jong In Yang; Byoung Kwon Kim; Jong Pil Im; Sang Gyun Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 2.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon.

Authors:  Timothy A Woodward; Michael G Heckman; Patrick Cleveland; Silvio De Melo; Massimo Raimondo; Michael Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  [Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital].

Authors:  B Zimmer; J Felber; M Lehmann; K Brenk-Franz; I Petersen; A Stallmach
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Clinical outcomes and factors related to resectability and curability of EMR for early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae Jun Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Ji Eun Kwon; Jae Kook Shin; Soung Min Jeon; Hyun Jung Bok; Jin Ha Lee; Chang Mo Moon; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Hoguen Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; David A Lieberman; Sidney J Winawer; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross; Ann G Zauber; Timothy R Church; Peter Lance; E Robert Greenberg; María Elena Martínez
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Diagnostic quality of: polyps resected by snare polypectomy: does the type of electrosurgical current used matter?

Authors:  Lucía C Fry; Audrey J Lazenby; Irina Mikolaenko; Brent Barranco; Steffen Rickes; Klaus Mönkemüller
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.

Authors:  Bret J Spier; Mark Benson; Patrick R Pfau; Gregory Nelligan; Michael R Lucey; Eric A Gaumnitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  A blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization and conventional snare polypectomy for diminutive colonic polypectomy in a porcine model.

Authors:  Andrew J Metz; Alan Moss; Duncan McLeod; Kayla Tran; Craig Godfrey; Abe Chandra; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected colorectal cancers that arose from sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Seo; Seung Ho Choi; Jaeyoung Chun; Changhyun Lee; Ji Min Choi; Eun Hyo Jin; Sung Wook Hwang; Jong Pil Im; Sang Gyun Kim; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-06-27

2.  Endoscopic resection for small esophageal submucosa tumor: Band ligation versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Cheol Woong Choi; Dae Hwan Kang; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.