Literature DB >> 22136778

Clinical outcomes and factors related to resectability and curability of EMR for early colorectal cancer.

Jae Jun Park1, Jae Hee Cheon, Ji Eun Kwon, Jae Kook Shin, Soung Min Jeon, Hyun Jung Bok, Jin Ha Lee, Chang Mo Moon, Sung Pil Hong, Tae Il Kim, Hoguen Kim, Won Ho Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EMR has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for selected cases of early colorectal cancer (ECC). However, the factors associated with resectability and curability of EMR for ECC remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical outcomes and factors related to resectability and curability in ECC cases treated with EMR.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: This study involved all patients in whom EMR was performed for ECC at Severance Hospital between March 1997 and August 2007. A total of 236 cases of ECC occurring in 231 patients (66.2% men) were enrolled. INTERVENTION: EMR. Curative surgical resection and lymph node dissection were used in cases that were incompletely cured by EMR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Resectability, curability, and recurrence.
RESULTS: Complete cure was achieved for 162 lesions (68.6%). Of the remaining 74 cases (31.4%), 69 (29.2%) were incompletely cured, and the other 5 (2.1%) had an undetermined resection status and ultimately required supplementary surgical resection for curative treatment. Location on the right side of the colon, piecemeal resection, and submucosal carcinoma were independently associated with incomplete resection, whereas depressed tumor type was independently related to incomplete cure. Among the ECC cases completely cured by EMR and followed for more than a year (n = 118), local recurrence was observed in one case (0.8%) during the median follow-up period of 39.4 months (range 12.4-123.1 months). LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that EMR is feasible and could be an effective option for treatment of ECC if the technique is applied with the appropriate indications.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136778     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Recurrent colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection when additional surgery was recommended.

Authors:  Yukiko Takatsu; Yosuke Fukunaga; Shunsuke Hamasaki; Atsushi Ogura; Jun Nagata; Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: the suture-pulley method significantly improves procedure time and minimizes technical difficulty compared with conventional technique: an ex vivo study (with video).

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aihara; Nitin Kumar; Marvin Ryou; Wasif Abidi; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Colonoscopy: Advanced and Emerging Techniques-A Review of Colonoscopic Approaches to Colorectal Conditions.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Jennifer Kim Lee
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

6.  Complete resection of colorectal adenomas: what are the important factors in fellow training?

Authors:  Ji Min Choi; Changhyun Lee; Jeong Hwan Park; Hyeon Jeong Oh; Sung Wook Hwang; Jaeyoung Chun; Seong-Joon Koh; Jong Pil Im; Ji Won Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Byeong Gwan Kim; Kook Lae Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Endoscopic resection of tumors in the lower digestive tract.

Authors:  Shi-Lun Cai; Qiang Shi; Tao Chen; Yun-Shi Zhong; Li-Qing Yao
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

8.  Risk factors of recurrence in T1 colorectal cancers treated by endoscopic resection alone or surgical resection with lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Yuta Kouyama; Shin-Ei Kudo; Hideyuki Miyachi; Katsuro Ichimasa; Shingo Matsudaira; Masashi Misawa; Yuichi Mori; Toyoki Kudo; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Fumio Ishida; Shigeharu Hamatani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Endoscopic Approach for Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Xu; Lang Yang; Peng Jin; Jian-Qiu Sheng
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-09-02

Review 10.  Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Motomi Terasaki; Nana Hayashi; Shiro Oka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.559

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.