Literature DB >> 25540066

Improved prediction of clinical outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Irena Ćojbašić1, Lana Mačukanović-Golubović, Dragan Mihailović, Miodrag Vučić, Stevo Lukić.   

Abstract

We sought to develop and compare prognostic models, based on clinical and/or morphometric diagnostic data, to enable better prediction of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR). This prospective longitudinal study included a consecutive series of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who were started on imatinib therapy. Logistic regression analysis using backward selection was performed with CCgR at 6, 12, and 18 months as the outcome variables. We evaluated both calibration and discrimination of the model. Internal validation of the model was performed with bootstrapping techniques. A total of 40 patients on imatinib therapy were included in the final analysis. Of these, 25 (62.5 %), 29 (72.5 %), and 32 (80 %), respectively, achieved CCgR at 6, 12, and 18 months after initiation of imatinib. Models included EUTOS score on diagnosis and one of the following morphometric parameters: microvascular density, length of the minor axis, area or circularity of the blood vessel. Models including morphometric parameters and EUTOS score were superior for prediction of CCgR at 6, 12, and 18 months. In particular, the superior models showed better specificity than EUTOS score alone. Using morphometric parameters in conjunction with EUTOS score improves prediction of CCgR. If validated, these models could aid in individual patient risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540066     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-014-1726-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  33 in total

1.  EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Jorge Cortes; Aziz Nazha; Susan O'Brien; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Sherry Pierce; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  In search of fewer independent risk factors.

Authors:  Daniel J Brotman; Esteban Walker; Michael S Lauer; Ralph G O'Brien
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-24

Review 3.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Prognosticating in patients with advanced cancer--observational study comparing the accuracy of clinicians' and patients' estimates of survival.

Authors:  B Gwilliam; V Keeley; C Todd; C Roberts; M Gittins; L Kelly; S Barclay; P Stone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J E Sokal; E B Cox; M Baccarani; S Tura; G A Gomez; J E Robertson; C Y Tso; T J Braun; B D Clarkson; F Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Patterns and prognostic indicators of response to CML treatment in a multi-country medical record review study.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Debanjali Mitra; Shrividya Iyer; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Fabrizio Pane; Dietger Niederwieser; Giuseppe Saglio; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Andreas Hochhaus; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Jerald Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Richard T Silver; John Goldman; Rudiger Hehlmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  European Treatment and Outcome Study score does not predict imatinib treatment response and outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Eri Yamamoto; Shin Fujisawa; Maki Hagihara; Masatsugu Tanaka; Katsumichi Fujimaki; Kumiko Kishimoto; Chizuko Hashimoto; Megumi Itabashi; Daisuke Ishibashi; Yuki Nakajima; Takayoshi Tachibana; Rika Kawasaki; Hideyuki Kuwabara; Hideyuki Koharazawa; Etsuko Yamazaki; Naoto Tomita; Rika Sakai; Hiroyuki Fujita; Heiwa Kanamori; Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.