Literature DB >> 22461032

Patterns and prognostic indicators of response to CML treatment in a multi-country medical record review study.

Peter C Trask1, Debanjali Mitra, Shrividya Iyer, Sean D Candrilli, James A Kaye.   

Abstract

We conducted a review of patient medical records to assess treatment response patterns and prognostic indicators of response among chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. All 1,063 patients selected met the following inclusion criteria: aged 18 or older and in chronic phase at the time of diagnosis, Philadelphia chromosome and/or BCR-ABL positive, received first-line treatment with imatinib, and not enrolled in a randomized clinical trial during the period of retrospective review. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate prognostic indicators of complete hematological response (CHR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and complete or major molecular response (C/MMR). Among patients treated with first-line imatinib, CHR at three months, CCyR at 12 months, and C/MMR at 18 months were observed in 53, 53.1, and 57.8 % of patients, respectively. Among patients treated with second-line dasatinib or nilotinib, CHR was achieved at three months in 49 and 42 %, CCyR at 12 months in 32 and 23 %, and MMR at 18 months in 30.5 and 26.1 % of patients, respectively. Prognostic indicators of first-line response included age, race, and Sokal score. For second-line treatment, duration of first-line hematological response and choice of drug used were also significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22461032     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-012-1043-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  20 in total

1.  Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  M Baccarani; M Dreyling
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Success story of targeted therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2008.

Authors:  Magnus Björkholm; Lotta Ohm; Sandra Eloranta; Asa Derolf; Malin Hultcrantz; Jan Sjöberg; Therese Andersson; Martin Höglund; Johan Richter; Ola Landgren; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Paul W Dickman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score.

Authors:  Joerg Hasford; Michele Baccarani; Verena Hoffmann; Joelle Guilhot; Susanne Saussele; Gianantonio Rosti; François Guilhot; Kimmo Porkka; Gert Ossenkoppele; Doris Lindoerfer; Bengt Simonsson; Markus Pfirrmann; Rudiger Hehlmann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian J Druker; François Guilhot; Stephen G O'Brien; Insa Gathmann; Hagop Kantarjian; Norbert Gattermann; Michael W N Deininger; Richard T Silver; John M Goldman; Richard M Stone; Francisco Cervantes; Andreas Hochhaus; Bayard L Powell; Janice L Gabrilove; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Jan J Cornelissen; Timothy Hughes; Hermine Agis; Thomas Fischer; Gregor Verhoef; John Shepherd; Giuseppe Saglio; Alois Gratwohl; Johan L Nielsen; Jerald P Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Kerry Taylor; Michele Baccarani; Charlene So; Laurie Letvak; Richard A Larson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patient characteristics and treatment patterns in chronic myeloid leukemia: evidence from a multi-country retrospective medical record chart review study.

Authors:  Debanjali Mitra; Peter C Trask; Shrividya Iyer; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa. Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group.

Authors:  J Hasford; M Pfirrmann; R Hehlmann; N C Allan; M Baccarani; J C Kluin-Nelemans; G Alimena; J L Steegmann; H Ansari
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; S G O'Brien; F Guilhot; B J Druker; S Branford; L Foroni; J M Goldman; M C Müller; J P Radich; M Rudoltz; M Mone; I Gathmann; T P Hughes; R A Larson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J E Sokal; E B Cox; M Baccarani; S Tura; G A Gomez; J E Robertson; C Y Tso; T J Braun; B D Clarkson; F Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Stephen G O'Brien; François Guilhot; Richard A Larson; Insa Gathmann; Michele Baccarani; Francisco Cervantes; Jan J Cornelissen; Thomas Fischer; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy Hughes; Klaus Lechner; Johan L Nielsen; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Giuseppe Saglio; John Shepherd; Bengt Simonsson; Alois Gratwohl; John M Goldman; Hagop Kantarjian; Kerry Taylor; Gregor Verhoef; Ann E Bolton; Renaud Capdeville; Brian J Druker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Francis Giles; Lydia Wunderle; Kapil Bhalla; Susan O'Brien; Barbara Wassmann; Chiaki Tanaka; Paul Manley; Patricia Rae; William Mietlowski; Kathy Bochinski; Andreas Hochhaus; James D Griffin; Dieter Hoelzer; Maher Albitar; Margaret Dugan; Jorge Cortes; Leila Alland; Oliver G Ottmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improved prediction of clinical outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Irena Ćojbašić; Lana Mačukanović-Golubović; Dragan Mihailović; Miodrag Vučić; Stevo Lukić
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  The European Treatment and Outcome Study score is associated with clinical outcomes and treatment response following European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Iriyama; Yoshihiro Hatta; Sumiko Kobayashi; Yoshihito Uchino; Katsuhiro Miura; Daisuke Kurita; Hitomi Kodaira; Mitsuru Inoue; Masami Takei
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Comparative analysis of the Sokal, Euro and European Treatment and Outcome Study score in prognostication of Indian chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase patients on imatinib.

Authors:  Sunita Chhikara; Sudha Sazawal; Kanwaljeet Singh; Rekha Chaubey; Haraprasad Pati; Seema Tyagi; Manoranjan Mahapatra; Renu Saxena
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mariko Yoshimura; Kensuke Kojima; Rika Tomimasu; Noriyasu Fukushima; Shinichiro Hayashi; Eisaburo Sueoka; Shinya Kimura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Biomarkers for determining the prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Kendra Sweet; Ling Zhang; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 17.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.