PURPOSE: To review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy. METHODS: These recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008. RESULTS: Cytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.
PURPOSE: To review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy. METHODS: These recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008. RESULTS: Cytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.
Authors: R T Silver; S H Woolf; R Hehlmann; F R Appelbaum; J Anderson; C Bennett; J M Goldman; F Guilhot; H M Kantarjian; A E Lichtin; M Talpaz; S Tura Journal: Blood Date: 1999-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Elias Jabbour; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dan Jones; Neeli Reddy; Susan O'Brien; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jan Burger; Jorge Cortes Journal: Blood Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Dan Jones; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; David Bahler; Henry Dong; Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson; Richard Press; Neil Quigley; Paul Rothberg; Dan Sabath; David Viswanatha; Karen Weck; James Zehnder Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Susan Branford; Linda Fletcher; Nicholas C P Cross; Martin C Müller; Andreas Hochhaus; Dong-Wook Kim; Jerald P Radich; Giuseppe Saglio; Fabrizio Pane; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Y Lynn Wang; Richard D Press; Kevin Lynch; Zbigniew Rudzki; John M Goldman; Timothy Hughes Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hagop Kantarjian; Francis Giles; Lydia Wunderle; Kapil Bhalla; Susan O'Brien; Barbara Wassmann; Chiaki Tanaka; Paul Manley; Patricia Rae; William Mietlowski; Kathy Bochinski; Andreas Hochhaus; James D Griffin; Dieter Hoelzer; Maher Albitar; Margaret Dugan; Jorge Cortes; Leila Alland; Oliver G Ottmann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elias Jabbour; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Sergio Giralt; Borje S Andersson; Francis Giles; Elizabeth Shpall; Partow Kebriaei; Richard Champlin; Marcos de Lima Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andreas L Petzer; Dominic Fong; Thomas Lion; Irina Dyagil; Zvenyslava Masliak; Andrija Bogdanovic; Laimonas Griskevicius; Sandra Lejniece; Stefan Goranov; Liana Gercheva; Aleksandar Stojanovic; Dontcho Peytchev; Nikolay Tzvetkov; Rasa Griniute; Atanas Stanchev; Thomas Grubinger; Marthin Kwakkelstein; Peter Schuld; Guenther Gastl; Dominik Wolf Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Aya Kuwabara; Anna Babb; Amr Ibrahim; Dragana Milojkovic; Jane Apperley; Marco Bua; Alistair Reid; Letizia Foroni; Katayoun Rezvani; John Goldman; David Marin Journal: Blood Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Susanne Saussele; Marie-Paloma Krauss; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Michael Lauseker; Ulrike Proetel; Lida Kalmanti; Benjamin Hanfstein; Alice Fabarius; Doris Kraemer; Wolfgang E Berdel; Martin Bentz; Peter Staib; Maike de Wit; Martin Wernli; Florian Zettl; Holger F Hebart; Markus Hahn; Jochen Heymanns; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Norbert Schmitz; Michael J Eckart; Winfried Gassmann; Andrea Bartholomäus; Antonio Pezzutto; Elisabeth Oppliger Leibundgut; Dominik Heim; Stefan W Krause; Andreas Burchert; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Joerg Hasford; Andreas Hochhaus; Markus Pfirrmann; Martin C Müller Journal: Blood Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 22.113