| Literature DB >> 25539789 |
Kikelomo Ololade Wright1, Ahmadu Shehu Mohammed, Olajumoke Salisu-Olatunji, Yetunde Abiola Kuyinu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical ectropion (also known as cervical erosion) is a common finding on routine pelvic examination during the fertile years. The decision to treat or not remains controversial. According to studies in support of routine treatment of cervical erosion, there is a possible relationship between squamous metaplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. To determine the prevalence of cervical ectropion and associated risk factors among clients with intra-uterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) attending a family planning clinic of a tertiary health institution in Lagos, Nigeria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25539789 PMCID: PMC4307624 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Frequency distribution of clients by year of registration at family planning clinic
| Year | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 227 | 36.1 |
| 2008 | 327 | 52.1 |
| 2009 | 18 | 2.9 |
| 2010 | 25 | 4.0 |
| 2011 | 31 | 4.9 |
|
|
|
|
Socio-demographic characteristics of clients
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 15 - 20 | 4 | 0.6 |
| 21 - 25 | 32 | 5.1 |
| 26 - 30 | 144 | 22.9 |
| 31 - 35 | 188 | 29.9 |
| 36 - 40 | 143 | 22.8 |
| >40 | 113 | 18.0 |
| No data | 4 | 0.6 |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| None | 17 | 2.7 |
| Primary | 35 | 5.6 |
| Secondary | 517 | 82.3 |
| Tertiary | 46 | 7.3 |
| No data | 13 | 2.1 |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| Christianity | 511 | 81.4 |
| Islam | 103 | 16.4 |
| No data | 14 | 2.2 |
| |
|
|
Age (Mean = 34.7 years, Median = 34 years, Mode = 35 years, Standard Deviation = 6.52). The majority (75.6%) of respondents were between ages 26 and 40 years conforming averagely to the reproductive age range.
Gynecological characteristics of clients
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Nulliparous | 4 | 0.6 |
| 1 - 2 | 207 | 33.0 |
| 3 - 5 | 367 | 58.4 |
| >5 | 38 | 6.1 |
| No data | 12 | 1.9 |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| None | 410 | 65.3 |
| Natural | 8 | 1.3 |
| Barrier | 50 | 8.0 |
| Oral | 40 | 6.4 |
| Injectable | 77 | 12.3 |
| Implant | 14 | 2.2 |
| No data | 29 | 4.6 |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| Yes | 131 | 20.9 |
| No | 468 | 74.5 |
| No data | 29 | 4.6 |
| |
|
|
Parity (Mean = 3.19, Median = 3, Mode = 3, Standard Deviation = 1.51).
Gynecological symptoms presented by clients
| Symptom | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Yes | 39 | 6.2 |
| No | 589 | 93.8 |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| Yes | 76 | 12.1 |
| No | 553 | 87.9 |
| |
|
|
Prevalence of cervical erosion among clients
| Presence of cervical erosion | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 79 | 12.6 |
| No | 549 | 87.4 |
| |
|
|
Treatment received by clients with cervical erosion (N = 79)
| Treatment | Yes | No | Chi square |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | No. (%) | P value | |
|
| 71 (89.9) | 8 (10.1) | X2 = 28.3 df = 2 |
|
| 46 (58.2) | 33 (41.8) | 95% CI = 0.02 to 5.99 |
|
| 42 (53.2) | 37 (46.8) | P < 0.001 |
Association between clients’ age and cervical erosion
| Age group (Years) | Cervical erosion | Chi square P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes frequency (%) | No frequency (%) | Total frequency (%) | ||
| 15 - 20 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) | 4 (100) | |
| 21 - 25 | 5 (15.6) | 27 (84.4) | 32 (100) | X2 = 5.44 |
| 26 - 30 | 15 (10.4) | 129 (89.6) | 144 (100) | df = 5 |
| 31 - 35 | 18 (9.6) | 170 (90.4) | 188 (100) | 95% CI = 0.554 to |
| 36 - 40 | 21 (14.7) | 122 (85.3) | 143 (100) | 11.07 |
| >40 | 19 (16.8) | 94 (83.2) | 113 (100) | P = 0.357 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Association between gynecological history and cervical erosion
| Gynecological history | Cervical erosion | Chi square P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes frequency (%) | No frequency (%) | Total frequency (%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Nulliparous | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | 4 (100) | X2 = 7.23 |
| 1 - 2 | 16 (7.7) | 191 (92.3) | 207 (100) | df = 3 |
| 3 - 5 | 55 (15.0) | 312 (85.0) | 367 (100) | 95% CI = 0.115 to |
| >5 | 6 (15.8) | 32 (84.2) | 38 (100) | 7.81 |
|
|
|
|
| P = 0. 065 |
|
| ||||
| No | 51 (10.9) | 417 (89.1) | 468 (100) | X2 = 4.19 |
| Yes | 23 (17.6) | 108 (82.4) | 131 (100) | df = 1 |
| |
|
|
| 95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P = 0.041 |
Association between gynecological symptoms and cervical erosion
| Gynecological symptom | Cervical erosion | Chi square P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes frequency (%) | No frequency (%) | Total frequency (%) | ||
|
| ||||
| No | 75 (12.7) | 514 (87.3) | 589 (100) | X2 = 0.204 |
| Yes | 4 (10.3) | 35 (89.7) | 39 (100) | df = 1 |
| |
|
|
| 95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P = 0. 806 |
|
| ||||
| No | 55 (10.0) | 497 (90.0) | 552 (100) | X2 = 28 .38 |
| Yes | 24 (31.6) | 52 (68.4) | 76 (100) | df = 1 |
| |
|
|
| 95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P <0.001 |
Multiple logistic regression predicting cervical ectropion from age, parity, hormonal contraceptives use, abnormal vaginal bleeding, and vaginal discharge
| Predictor |
| Wald χ2 |
| Odds ratio | 95% CI for odds ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.025 | 1.185 | 0.276 | 1.026 | 0.98 | 1.074 |
| Parity | 0.112 | 1.214 | 0.271 | 1.119 | 0.916 | 1.366 |
| Hormonal contraceptives use | 0.525 | 3.229 | 0.072 | 1.69 | 0.953 | 2.997 |
| Abnormal vaginal bleeding | -0.583 | 0.851 | 0.356 | 0.558 | 0.162 | 1.926 |
| Vaginal discharge | 1.52 | 26.433 | < 0.001 | 4.571 | 2.561 | 8.158 |
Omnibus Test of Model Coefficient (χ2 = 33.337, d.f. = 5, p < 0.001).