Literature DB >> 14667326

Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices.

E Caliskan1, N Oztürk, B O Dilbaz, S Dilbaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for intrauterine devices (IUDs) being displaced into the abdominal cavity.
METHODS: This prospective follow-up study was conducted between 1996 and 2002, at the family planning clinic of a referral hospital. All 8343 women who had a copper T-380A IUD inserted underwent ultrasound examination after 1 year. Relative risk estimates and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices.
RESULTS: Eighteen uterine perforations occurred during the study, giving an incidence of 2.2 per 1000 insertions. When the time elapsed after the last delivery until IUD insertion is considered, postplacental insertion and insertion after 6 months postpartum were found not to increase the risk of uterine perforation. However, IUD insertion 0-3 months postpartum increased the risk of uterine perforation (odds ratio (OR) 11.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-49.2) as did insertions at 3-6 months postpartum (OR 13.2, CI 2.8-62). Increasing parity decreased the risk (OR 0.04, CI 0.01-0.1) and increasing number of abortions increased the risk (OR 2.1, CI 1.2-3.6).
CONCLUSION: It is safer to postpone IUD insertion until 6 months after delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14667326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  26 in total

1.  Silent uterine perforation by an IUCD inserted during the puerperium.

Authors:  Hugh Harvey; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-07-20

2.  Incidental detection of a transmigrated intrauterine device.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Levsky; Mark Herskovits
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-05-14

3.  Uterine perforation and migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device in a 24-year-old patient seeking care for abdominal pain.

Authors:  Michelle Barber; Daryl S Chalifour; Maria R Anderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-04-05

4.  Initiation of postpartum contraception: a survey among health centre physicians and nurses in Finland.

Authors:  Tuire Sannisto; Elise Kosunen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Mustafa Kaplanoğlu; Mehmet Bülbül; Tuncay Yüce; Dilek Kaplanoğlu; Meral Aban
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 6.  Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (52 mg) for Idiopathic Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device detected in a pregnant woman.

Authors:  Migraci Tosun; Handan Celik; Erhan Yavuz; Mehmet B Cetinkaya
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The Moral Nature and Practice of Natural Family Planning versus Contraception.

Authors:  Brian Mullady; Lester Ruppersberger
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-08-01

9.  Urinary complications of migrated intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Ahmed S El-Hefnawy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Yaser Osman; Mahmoud A Bazeed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-07-14

10.  A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system embedded in the omentum in a woman with abdominal pain: a case report.

Authors:  Asimakis Pappas; Siddesh Shambhu; Kevin Phillips; Kate Guthrie
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.