Literature DB >> 19550216

Treatability by cryotherapy in a screen-and-treat strategy.

Julia C Gage1, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Mark Schiffman, Francisco M Garcia, Rodney L Long, Scott R Budihas, Rolando Herrero, Robert D Burk, Jose Jeronimo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We estimated the percentage of women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV+) who cannot be immediately treated with cryotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 10,000-woman Costa Rican cohort, we analyzed the 559 HPV+ women aged 25 to 55 years and estimated the proportion for whom immediate cryotherapy was not indicated (i.e., invasive cancer, large precancerous lesions, or benign abnormalities that risk failure such as large ectopy, squamocolumnar junction not visualized, polyps, ulcers, or distorted or atrophied cervix). To determine whether cryotherapy at time of baseline HPV screening would effectively treat HPV+ women, 2 expert gynecologists independently judged entire clinical histories (5-7 years of cytology, histology, and HPV tests) and a full longitudinal series of digitized cervical images.
RESULTS: Reviewers judged 144 (25.8%) of 559 HPV+ women as not treatable by immediate cryotherapy. Among 72 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 who would benefit most from a screening program, 35 (48.6%) were not treatable. In particular, 29 women (40.3%) were determined not treatable for reasons most likely associated with cryotherapy's inadequacy (lesion was large, suspected cancerous or in the endocervical canal or fornix).
CONCLUSIONS: "Screen-and-treat" programs in low-resource settings will soon use a rapid HPV test to screen older women once or twice in their lifetime, identifying women at higher risk for precancer. Our findings suggest that cryotherapy might not effectively treat many precancers, and other safe, low-technology treatment options could be required, in a scenario where all HPV+ women in this targeted group would receive cryotherapy at the same visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19550216      PMCID: PMC2735767          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181909f30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  20 in total

1.  The promise of global cervical-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cervical cancer prevention: safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a single-visit approach in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Paul D Blumenthal; Lynne Gaffikin; Sylvia Deganus; Robbyn Lewis; Mark Emerson; Sydney Adadevoh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Digital tools for collecting data from cervigrams for research and training in colposcopy.

Authors:  Jose Jeronimo; L Rodney Long; Leif Neve; Bopf Michael; Sameer Antani; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China.

Authors:  You-Lin Qiao; John W Sellors; Paul S Eder; Yan-Ping Bao; Jeanette M Lim; Fang-Hui Zhao; Bernhard Weigl; Wen-Hua Zhang; Roger B Peck; Ling Li; Feng Chen; Qing-Jing Pan; Attila T Lorincz
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Jose Jeronimo; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study.

Authors:  M A Nobbenhuis; J M Walboomers; T J Helmerhorst; L Rozendaal; A J Remmink; E K Risse; H C van der Linden; F J Voorhorst; P Kenemans; C J Meijer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lynette Denny; Louise Kuhn; Michelle De Souza; Amy E Pollack; William Dupree; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The natural history of human papillomavirus infection as measured by repeated DNA testing in adolescent and young women.

Authors:  A B Moscicki; S Shiboski; J Broering; K Powell; L Clayton; N Jay; T M Darragh; R Brescia; S Kanowitz; S B Miller; J Stone; E Hanson; J Palefsky
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Incidence, duration, and determinants of cervical human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of Colombian women with normal cytological results.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; Fabián Méndez; Héctor Posso; Mónica Molano; Adrian J C van den Brule; Margarita Ronderos; Chris Meijer; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Epidemiologic profile of type-specific human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

Authors:  Rolando Herrero; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; M Concepción Bratti; Allan Hildesheim; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Mark E Sherman; Sholom Wacholder; Sabrina Chen; Ana C Rodriguez; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cervical cancer prevention in HIV-infected women using the "see and treat" approach in Botswana.

Authors:  Doreen Ramogola-Masire; Ronny de Klerk; Barati Monare; Bakgaki Ratshaa; Harvey M Friedman; Nicola M Zetola
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 2.  Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy.

Authors:  Patti E Gravitt; Jerome L Belinson; Jorge Salmeron; Keerti V Shah
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  An evaluation by midwives and gynecologists of treatability of cervical lesions by cryotherapy among human papillomavirus-positive women.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark Schiffman; Sydney Adadevoh; Manuel J Alvarez Larraondo; Bandit Chumworathayi; Sandra Vargas Lejarza; Luis Villegas Araya; Francisco Garcia; Scott R Budihas; Rodney Long; Hormuzd A Katki; Rolando Herrero; Robert D Burk; Jose Jeronimo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands: Options and Opportunities.

Authors:  Alan G Waxman; Lee E Buenconsejo-Lum; Miriam Cremer; Sarah Feldman; Kevin A Ault; Joanna M Cain; Maria Lina Diaz
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Cervical Ectropion and Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD): a five-year retrospective study of family planning clients of a tertiary health institution in Lagos Nigeria.

Authors:  Kikelomo Ololade Wright; Ahmadu Shehu Mohammed; Olajumoke Salisu-Olatunji; Yetunde Abiola Kuyinu
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-12-23

6.  Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.

Authors:  Nicole G Campos; Mercy Mvundura; Jose Jeronimo; Francesca Holme; Elisabeth Vodicka; Jane J Kim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The development of "automated visual evaluation" for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening.

Authors:  Kanan T Desai; Brian Befano; Zhiyun Xue; Helen Kelly; Nicole G Campos; Didem Egemen; Julia C Gage; Ana-Cecilia Rodriguez; Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe; David Levitz; Paul Pearlman; Jose Jeronimo; Sameer Antani; Mark Schiffman; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 7.316

8.  Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection and HPV testing in Eswatini.

Authors:  Themba G Ginindza; Mathilde Forestier; Maribel Almonte
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.637

9.  Community-based HPV self-collection versus visual inspection with acetic acid in Uganda: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ASPIRE trial.

Authors:  Alex K Mezei; Heather N Pedersen; Stephen Sy; Catherine Regan; Sheona M Mitchell-Foster; Josaphat Byamugisha; Musa Sekikubo; Heather Armstrong; Angeli Rawat; Joel Singer; Gina S Ogilvie; Jane J Kim; Nicole G Campos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The cost-effectiveness of implementing HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in El Salvador.

Authors:  Nicole G Campos; Mauricio Maza; Karla Alfaro; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle; Juan C Felix; Rachel Masch; Miriam Cremer; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.