Literature DB >> 25539242

Feasibility of discriminating uric acid from non-uric acid renal stones using consecutive spatially registered low- and high-energy scans obtained on a conventional CT scanner.

Shuai Leng1, Maria Shiung, Songtao Ai, Mingliang Qu, Terri J Vrtiska, Katharine L Grant, Bernhard Krauss, Bernhard Schmidt, John C Lieske, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to show the feasibility of distinguishing between uric acid (UA) and non-UA renal stones using two consecutive spatially registered low- and high-energy scans acquired on a conventional CT system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT examinations to differentiate UA from non-UA renal stones were enrolled in this study. Immediately after patients underwent clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT, two consecutive scans (one at 80 kV and one at 140 kV) were obtained on a conventional CT scanner over the region limited to the stones identified on the dual-source scans. After 3D deformable registration of the 80- and 140-kV images, UA and non-UA stones were identified using commercial software. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of stone classification were calculated using the dual-source results as the reference standard.
RESULTS: A total of 469 stones were identified in the dual-source examinations (26 UA and 443 non-UA stones). The average in-plane stone diameter was 4.4 ± 2.5 (SD) mm (range, 2.0-18.9 mm). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying UA stones were 73.1%, 90.1%, and 89.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.7%, 96.9%, and 96.8% for stones 3 mm or larger (n = 341 [19 UA and 322 non-UA]).
CONCLUSION: Accurate differentiation of UA from non-UA renal stones is feasible using two consecutively acquired and spatially registered conventional CT scans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; deformable registration; dual-energy CT; renal stone; stone composition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25539242      PMCID: PMC4280671          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting.

Authors:  S Y Nakada; D G Hoff; S Attai; D Heisey; D Blankenbaker; M Pozniak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Giuseppina Manglaviti; Silvia Tresoldi; Chiara Stefania Guerrer; Giovanni Di Leo; Emanuele Montanari; Francesco Sardanelli; Gianpaolo Cornalba
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Nephrolithiasis: what surgeons need to know.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Joseph W McQuaid; Elias Hyams; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Dual-energy dual-source CT with additional spectral filtration can improve the differentiation of non-uric acid renal stones: an ex vivo phantom study.

Authors:  Mingliang Qu; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Shuai Leng; James C Williams; Terri J Vrtiska; John C Lieske; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Targeted dual-energy single-source CT for characterisation of urinary calculi: experimental and clinical experience.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Konstantin Holzapfel; Markus Frimberger; Michael Straub; Heike Schneider; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz; Armin Huber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Urinary calculi composed of uric acid, cystine, and mineral salts: differentiation with dual-energy CT at a radiation dose comparable to that of intravenous pyelography.

Authors:  Christoph Thomas; Martin Heuschmid; David Schilling; Dominik Ketelsen; Ilias Tsiflikas; Arnulf Stenzl; Claus D Claussen; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  In vivo determination of urinary stone composition using dual energy computerized tomography with advanced post-acquisition processing.

Authors:  D E Zilberman; M N Ferrandino; G M Preminger; E K Paulson; M E Lipkin; D T Boll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Determination of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Brian H Eisner; Daniella F Pinho; Mukta C Joshi; Avinash R Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Urinary stone differentiation in patients with large body size using dual-energy dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Mingliang Qu; Giselle Jaramillo-Alvarez; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Yu Liu; Xinhui Duan; Jia Wang; Terri J Vrtiska; Amy E Krambeck; John Lieske; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

1.  Motion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom study.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Joseph G Cernigliaro; Robert A Pooley; James C Williams; William E Haley
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Michael J Callahan; Harriet J Paltiel; Caleb P Nelson; Bartley G Cilento; Michelle A Baum; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

3.  Improving Structure Delineation for Radiation Therapy Planning Using Dual-Energy CT.

Authors:  George Noid; Justin Zhu; An Tai; Nilesh Mistry; Diane Schott; Douglas Prah; Eric Paulson; Christopher Schultz; X Allen Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Spectral performance of a whole-body research photon counting detector CT: quantitative accuracy in derived image sets.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Wei Zhou; Zhicong Yu; Ahmed Halaweish; Bernhard Krauss; Bernhard Schmidt; Lifeng Yu; Steffen Kappler; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dual-Energy CT for Quantification of Urinary Stone Composition in Mixed Stones: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Alice Huang; Juan Montoya Cardona; Xinhui Duan; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Stone Composition Among First-Time Symptomatic Kidney Stone Formers in the Community.

Authors:  Prince Singh; Felicity T Enders; Lisa E Vaughan; Eric J Bergstralh; John J Knoedler; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Recognizing and Minimizing Artifacts at Dual-Energy CT.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Chansik An; Simon Lennartz; Prabhakar Rajiah; Benjamin M Yeh; Frank J Simeone; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash R Kambadakone
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Characterization of Ureteric Calculi and Urinary Obstruction.

Authors:  Anchal Singh; Sachin Khanduri; Nazia Khan; Poonam Yadav; Mushahid Husain; Ahmad Umar Khan; Mazhar Khan; Shreshtha Jain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-07

10.  Evaluation of a commercial deformable image registration algorithm for dual-energy CT processing.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Michael J Lawless; Charles K Matrosic; Lianna D Di Maso; Jessica R Miller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.