Literature DB >> 21843023

On the existence of semantic working memory: evidence for direct semantic maintenance.

Geeta Shivde1, Michael C Anderson.   

Abstract

Despite widespread acknowledgment of the importance of online semantic maintenance, there has been astonishingly little work that clearly establishes this construct. We review the extant work relevant to short-term retention of meaning and show that, although consistent with semantic working memory, most data can be accommodated in other ways. Using a new concurrent probe paradigm, we then report experiments that implicate a semantic maintenance capacity that is independent of phonological or visual maintenance that may build on a mechanism of direct semantic maintenance. Experiments 1 through 5 established that while subjects maintain the meaning of a word, a novel delay-period marker of semantic retention, the semantic relatedness effect, is observed on a concurrent lexical decision task. The semantic relatedness effect refers to slowed response times when subjects make a lexical decision to a probe that is associatively related to the idea they are maintaining, compared to when the probe is unrelated. The semantic relatedness effect occurred for semantic but not for phonological or visual word-form maintenance, dissipated quickly after maintenance ends, and survived concurrent articulatory suppression. The effect disappeared when subjects performed our immediate memory task with a long-term memory strategy rather than with active maintenance. Experiment 6 demonstrated a parallel phonological relatedness effect that occurs for phonological but not semantic maintenance, establishing a full double dissociation between the effects of semantic and phonological maintenance. These findings support a distinct semantic maintenance capacity and provide a behavioral marker through which semantic working memory can be studied.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21843023     DOI: 10.1037/a0024832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Nathan S Rose; Tiffany Deschamps; Rosie C Leigh; Lilia Panamsky; Alexandra Silberberg; Noushin Madani; Kira A Links
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

2.  The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading.

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Marilyne Maltais
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

3.  Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Lin; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Yvonne C Lai; Denise H Wu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

4.  Novel word acquisition in aphasia: Facing the word-referent ambiguity of natural language learning contexts.

Authors:  Claudia Peñaloza; Daniel Mirman; Leena Tuomiranta; Annalisa Benetello; Ida-Maria Heikius; Sonja Järvinen; Maria C Majos; Pedro Cardona; Montserrat Juncadella; Matti Laine; Nadine Martin; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  More is not always better: paradoxical effects of repetition on semantic accessibility.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  The linguistic constraints of precision of verbal working memory.

Authors:  Marion Bouffier; Martine Poncelet; Steve Majerus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Dominic Guitard; Nathaniel R Greene; Sylvain Fiset
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Proactive interference does not meaningfully distort visual working memory capacity estimates in the canonical change detection task.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-28

9.  Active maintenance of semantic representations.

Authors:  Ryoji Nishiyama
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Short-term retention of a single word relies on retrieval from long-term memory when both rehearsal and refreshing are disrupted.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.