Literature DB >> 25537736

A randomized comparison between the i-gel™ and the air-Q™ supraglottic airways when used by anesthesiology trainees as conduits for tracheal intubation in children.

Narasimhan Jagannathan1, Lisa Sohn, Melissa Ramsey, Andrea Huang, Amod Sawardekar, Luis Sequera-Ramos, Loryn Kromrey, Gildasio S De Oliveira.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Supraglottic airways are commonly used as conduits for fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB)-guided intubation in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that anesthesiology trainees with limited prior experience with FOB-guided intubation through a supraglottic airway in children would intubate the trachea faster through the air-Q™ supraglottic airway than through the i-gel™.
METHODS: Ninety-six children aged one month to six years were randomized to receive either the i-gel or air-Q for FOB-guided tracheal intubation by anesthesiology trainees. Time for successful tracheal intubation was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included: time for device insertion, number of attempts for successful device insertion, airway leak pressures, FOB grade of laryngeal view, total number of attempts for tracheal intubation, time for removal of the device after tracheal intubation, and associated complications.
RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) times to successful tracheal intubation for the air-Q (62.5 [47.9-77] sec) and the i-gel (55.9 [48.5-81.8] sec) were not significantly different (median difference 6.6 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI] -13.3 to 8.7; P = 0.53). The median (IQR) time to insertion for the air-Q (16.7 [14.4-20.0] sec) was shorter than for the i-gel (19.6 [16.7-23.0] sec) (median difference 2.9 sec; 95% CI 0.8 to 4.7; P = 0.005). There were no differences between devices with respect to airway leak pressures, success rates, and time to removal. Compared with the air-Q, the i-gel was associated with more problems during device removal after tracheal intubation, including breakage of the tracheal tube pilot balloon (n = 0 vs n = 13, respectively; P < 0.001), inadvertent extubation (n = 1 vs n = 5, respectively; P < 0.001), and difficulty controlling the tracheal tube (n = 0 vs n = 21, respectively; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, both the air-Q and i-gel supraglottic airways served as effective conduits for FOB-guided tracheal intubation in children when performed by trainees with limited prior experience. The i-gel, however, was associated with more problems during device removal following tracheal intubation. This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02189590 .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537736     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0304-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Efficacy of the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway during General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eun Jin Ahn; Geun Joo Choi; Hyun Kang; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Young Cheol Woo; Si Ra Bang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Srinath Damodaran; Sameer Sethi; Surender Kumar Malhotra; Tanvir Samra; Souvik Maitra; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

3.  A Comparison between the i-gel® and air-Q® Supraglottic Airway Devices Used for the Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia with Muscle Relaxation.

Authors:  Nilofar Massoudi; Mohammad Fathi; Navid Nooraei; Alireza Salehi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Supraglottic airway devices as a strategy for unassisted tracheal intubation: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  EunJin Ahn; GeunJoo Choi; Hyun Kang; ChongWha Baek; YongHun Jung; YoungCheol Woo; SiRa Bang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and nonobese patients.

Authors:  Rati Prabha; Rajesh Raman; Mohammad Parvez Khan; Dinesh Kaushal; Ahsan Khaliq Siddiqui; Haider Abbas
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

6.  A comparison of supraglottic devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Senthil G Krishna; Faizaan Syed; Mohammed Hakim; Mumin Hakim; Dmitry Tumin; Giorgio C Veneziano; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Comparison of Air-QⓇ insertion techniques in pediatric patients with fiber-optic bronchoscopic assessment: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Manasa Gaddam; Sameer Sethi; Aditi Jain; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-04

8.  Supraglottic Airway Devices for Elective Pediatric Anesthesia: I-gel versus Air-Q, Which is the Best?

Authors:  Rami Mounir Wahba; Milad Zekry Ragaei; Ayman Anis Metry; George Mikhael Nakhla
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 9.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Use of supraglottic airway devices in paediatric patients in the Indian context - some we know, some we need to know and march ahead.

Authors:  Priyam Saikia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.