Literature DB >> 25536713

Reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Benchaporn Aree-uea, Narong Auvichayapat, Taweesak Janyacharoen, Wantana Siritaratiwat, Anuwat Amatachaya, Jitlada Prasertnoo, Orathai Tunkamnerdthai, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Mark P Jensen, Paradee Auvichayapat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anti-spasticity effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Forty-six children and adolescents with cerebral palsy were randomly assigned to either active (1 mA anodal) or sham (placebo) tDCS over the left primary motor cortex (Ml) on five consecutive days. Both group also received routine physical therapy. Measures of spasticity and passive range of motion (PROM) were administered before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 24- and 48-hours follow-up.
RESULTS: Participants assigned to active tDCS treatment evidenced significantly more pre- to immediately post-treatment reductions in spasticity than participants assigned to the sham (p = 0.004, p<O. 001l, andp = 0.004 for shoulder wrist, and fingers respectively) and these improvement in spasticity maintainedfor at least 48 hours for wrist joints (p = 0.023). There was only one participant in the active tDCS condition developed erythematous rash. However, all participants tolerated the tDCS well without any serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Anodal tDCS appeared to reduce CP-relatedspasticity (but not PROM) in the short term. Researches examine the long term benefits of this intervention on spasticity are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25536713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  15 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ulrich Palm; Felix M Segmiller; Ann Natascha Epple; Franz-Joseph Freisleder; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Frank Padberg
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.

Authors:  Mustafa Q Hameed; Sameer C Dhamne; Roman Gersner; Harper L Kaye; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and rehabilitation to promote functional restoration in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer A Iddings; Anastasia Zarkou; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.283

Review 5.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  The effects of concurrent M1 anodal tDCS and physical therapy interventions on function of ankle muscles in patients with stroke: a randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled trial study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ehsani; Marzieh Mortezanejad; Mohaddeseh Hafez Yosephi; Said Daniali; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Cardiovascular Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Bimanual Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Manda L Keller-Ross; Daniel P Chantigian; Samuel Nemanich; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

8.  Priming Neural Circuits to Modulate Spinal Reflex Excitability.

Authors:  Stephen P Estes; Jennifer A Iddings; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Transient Changes in Brain Metabolites after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Paradee Auvichayapat; Benchaporn Aree-Uea; Narong Auvichayapat; Warinthorn Phuttharak; Taweesak Janyacharoen; Orathai Tunkamnerdthai; Wuttisak Boonphongsathian; Niran Ngernyam; Keattichai Keeratitanont
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.

Authors:  Georgia H O'Leary; Dorothea D Jenkins; Patricia Coker-Bolt; Mark S George; Steve Kautz; Marom Bikson; Bernadette T Gillick; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.