Kory W Mathewson1, Mark J Haykowsky2, Richard B Thompson1. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Develop an MRI method to estimate skeletal muscle oxygen consumption (VO2 ) with dynamic exercise using simultaneous measurement of venous blood flow (VBF) and venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ). METHODS: Real-time imaging of femoral VBF using a complex-difference method was interleaved with imaging of venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SvO2 ) using magnetic susceptometry to estimate muscle VO2 (Fick principle). Nine healthy subjects performed repeated 5-watt knee-extension (quadriceps) exercise within the bore of a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, for test/re-test comparison. VBF, SvO2 , and derived VO2 were estimated at baseline and immediately (<1 s) postexercise and every 2.4 s for 4 min. RESULTS: Quadriceps muscle mass was 2.43 ± 0.31 kg. Mean baseline values were VBF = 0.13 ± 0.06 L/min/kg, SvO2 = 69.4 ± 10.1%, and VO2 = 6.8 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg. VBF, SvO2 , and VO2 values from peak exercise had good agreement between trials (VBF = 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 1.0 ± 0.1 L/min/kg, R(2) = 0.83, CV = 7.6%; SvO2 = 43.2 ± 13.5 versus 40.9 ± 13.1%, R(2) = 0.88, CV = 15.6%; VO2 = 95.7 ± 18.0 versus 108.9 ± 17.3 mL/min/kg, R(2) = 0.88, CV = 12.3%), as did the VO2 recovery time constant (26.1 ± 3.5 versus 26.0 ± 4.0 s, R(2) = 0.85, CV = 6.0%). CV = coefficient of variation. CONCLUSION: Rapid imaging of VBF and SvO2 for the estimation of whole muscle VO2 is compatible with dynamic exercise for the estimation of peak values and recovery dynamics following exercise with good reproducibility.
PURPOSE: Develop an MRI method to estimate skeletal muscle oxygen consumption (VO2 ) with dynamic exercise using simultaneous measurement of venous blood flow (VBF) and venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ). METHODS: Real-time imaging of femoral VBF using a complex-difference method was interleaved with imaging of venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SvO2 ) using magnetic susceptometry to estimate muscle VO2 (Fick principle). Nine healthy subjects performed repeated 5-watt knee-extension (quadriceps) exercise within the bore of a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, for test/re-test comparison. VBF, SvO2 , and derived VO2 were estimated at baseline and immediately (<1 s) postexercise and every 2.4 s for 4 min. RESULTS: Quadriceps muscle mass was 2.43 ± 0.31 kg. Mean baseline values were VBF = 0.13 ± 0.06 L/min/kg, SvO2 = 69.4 ± 10.1%, and VO2 = 6.8 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg. VBF, SvO2 , and VO2 values from peak exercise had good agreement between trials (VBF = 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 1.0 ± 0.1 L/min/kg, R(2) = 0.83, CV = 7.6%; SvO2 = 43.2 ± 13.5 versus 40.9 ± 13.1%, R(2) = 0.88, CV = 15.6%; VO2 = 95.7 ± 18.0 versus 108.9 ± 17.3 mL/min/kg, R(2) = 0.88, CV = 12.3%), as did the VO2 recovery time constant (26.1 ± 3.5 versus 26.0 ± 4.0 s, R(2) = 0.85, CV = 6.0%). CV = coefficient of variation. CONCLUSION: Rapid imaging of VBF and SvO2 for the estimation of whole muscle VO2 is compatible with dynamic exercise for the estimation of peak values and recovery dynamics following exercise with good reproducibility.
Authors: Erin K Englund; Zachary B Rodgers; Michael C Langham; Emile R Mohler; Thomas F Floyd; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Erin K Englund; Michael C Langham; Felix W Wehrli; Molly J Fanning; Zeeshan Khan; Kathryn H Schmitz; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Thomas F Floyd; Emile R Mohler Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.125
Authors: Jessica E Caterini; Kate Rendall; Barbara Cifra; Jane E Schneiderman; Felix Ratjen; Mike Seed; Tammy Rayner; Ruth Weiss; Brian W McCrindle; Michael D Noseworthy; Craig A Williams; Alan R Barker; Gregory D Wells Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-05
Authors: Nicholas E Houstis; Aaron S Eisman; Paul P Pappagianopoulos; Luke Wooster; Cole S Bailey; Peter D Wagner; Gregory D Lewis Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard B Thompson; Joseph J Pagano; Kory W Mathewson; Ian Paterson; Jason R Dyck; Dalane W Kitzman; Mark J Haykowsky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jan Gojda; Petr Waldauf; Natália Hrušková; Barbora Blahutová; Adéla Krajčová; Tomáš Urban; Petr Tůma; Kamila Řasová; František Duška Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amy A Kirkham; Edith Pituskin; John R Mackey; Justin G Grenier; D Ian Paterson; Mark J Haykowsky; Richard B Thompson Journal: Oncologist Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 5.837