| Literature DB >> 35579489 |
Amy A Kirkham1, Edith Pituskin2, John R Mackey2, Justin G Grenier2, D Ian Paterson2, Mark J Haykowsky2, Richard B Thompson2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While cardiotoxic chemotherapy is known to negatively impact cardiac function and hemoglobin levels, the impact on skeletal muscle has been understudied among patients. The purpose was to longitudinally characterize myosteatosis (muscle fat), skeletal muscle metabolism, and oxygen (O2) consumption during cardiotoxic chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with stage I-III breast cancer were enrolled before trastuzumab-containing and/or anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. We used magnetic resonance imaging to non-invasively quantify thigh myosteatosis (fat-water imaging), and lower leg metabolism (31P spectroscopy), O2 consumption (custom techniques), and peak power output during single-leg plantarflexion exercise at pre-, mid-, end-chemotherapy, and 1-year. We also measured pulmonary VO2peak and maximal leg press strength.Entities:
Keywords: breast neoplasm; cardiotoxicity; drug therapy; magnetic resonance imaging; muscle; skeletal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35579489 PMCID: PMC9438914 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncologist ISSN: 1083-7159 Impact factor: 5.837
Descriptive and resting variables.
| Controls ( | Patients ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 56 ± 10 | 51 ± 10 | |||
| Breast cancer stage, | n/a | ||||
| I | 4 (12%) | ||||
| II | 25 (74%) | ||||
| III | 5 (15%) | ||||
| Chemotherapy regimen | n/a | ||||
| Anthracycline-containing, | 24 (71%) | ||||
| Anthracycline dose (mg/m2), median | 301 | ||||
| Trastuzumab-containing, | 9 (26%) | ||||
| Trastuzumab dose (mg/kg), median | 107 | ||||
| Radiation therapy, | n/a | ||||
| Left sided | 18 (53%) | ||||
| Dose (cGy), median | 4500 | ||||
| Right sided | 13 (38%) | ||||
| None | 3 (9%) | ||||
Different from pre-chemotherapy (P ≤ .05).
Skeletal muscle performance metrics.
| Spectroscopy variable | Control ( | Patients ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-chemotherapy | Mid-chemotherapy | End-chemotherapy | One year | ||
| Incremental maximal test plantar flexion test peak power output (W) | 15.7 (3.1) | 14.5 (3.5) | 14.7 (3.8) | 14.3 (3.8) | 14.6 (3.6) |
| Submaximal 4-minute steady-state plantarflexion test power output (W) | 10.0 (1.9) | 8.9 (2.0) | 9.1 (2.1) | 8.9 (2.3) | 9.2 (2.2) |
| Plantarflexion exercise efficiency (power output/VO2 reserve, W/mL/minute) | 0.25 (0.08) | 0.24 (0.07) | 0.22 (0.05) | 0.21 (0.07) | 0.23 (0.07) |
| Cycle ergometer pulmonary VO2peak (mL/kg/minute) | 29.5 (7.7) | 27.5 (7.1) | n/a | 25.1 (6.7) | 26.8 (7.0) |
| Cycle ergometer pulmonary VO2peak (L/minute) | 2.13 (0.41) | 1.97 (0.49) | n/a | 1.82 (0.47) | 1.94 (0.44) |
| Leg press 1-repetition maximum (kg) | n/a | 86.2 (38.4) | n/a | 77.7 (30.9) | 86.0 (29.3) |
Different from pre-chemotherapy (P ≤ .05).
Different from mid-chemotherapy (P ≤ .05).
n/a = not collected.
Figure 1.Changes to lower leg oxygen delivery, extraction, consumption, and exercise efficiency with single leg plantarflexion exercise across chemotherapy treatment.
31P spectroscopy data for rest, low intensity (40% peak power), high intensity (80% peak power) and peak exercise, and PCr recovery.
| Spectroscopy variable | Control ( | Patients ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-chemotherapy | Mid-chemotherapy | End-chemotherapy | One year | ||
| Pi:PCr resting | 0.10 (0.02) | 0.11 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.03) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) |
| Pi:PCr 40% intensity | 0.31 (0.08) | 0.29 (0.07) | 0.34 (0.08) | 0.32 (0.07) | 0.32 (0.06) |
| Pi:PCr 80% intensity | 0.61 (0.17) | 0.58 (0.22) | 0.62 (0.19) | 0.56 (0.17) | 0.56 (0.22) |
| Pi:PCr peak exercise | 0.84 (0.23) | 0.78 (0.29) | 0.84 (0.26) | 0.74 (0.22)‡ | 0.72 (0.28) |
| pH resting | 7.09 (0.11) | 7.07 (0.05) | 7.09 (0.07) | 7.07 (0.04) | 7.08 (0.04) |
| pH 40% intensity | 7.07 (0.08) | 7.08 (0.06) | 7.06 (0.07) | 7.09 (0.04) | 7.11 (0.06) |
| pH 80% intensity | 6.75 (0.3) | 6.86 (0.19) | 6.79 (0.22) | 6.84 (0.20) | 6.90 (0.21) |
| pH peak exercise | 6.62 (0.28) | 6.73 (0.21) | 6.67 (0.22) | 6.73 (0.29) | 6.77 (0.24) |
| PCr recovery time constant (s) | 33 (9) | 37 (13) | 40 (17) | 38 (11) | 33 (10) |
Different from pre-chemotherapy (P ≤ .05).
Different from mid-chemotherapy (P ≤ .05).
Figure 2.Relative changes in thigh muscle and fat across chemotherapy treatment error bars are 95% confidence intervals.